Merriam-Webster dictionary has quietly changed the definition of the term ‘vaccine’ to include components of the COVID-19 mRNA injection. The definition of vaccine was specifically changed due to the COVID-19 injection.
The definition of ‘vaccine’ as ofFebruary 5th 2021:
The definition of ‘vaccine’ as of February 6th 2021:
A vaccine used to be “a preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease”, meaning it had nothing to do with mRNA injections, which are not live vaccines and do not use an infectious element.
Why do you suppose they are working so hard to classify the corona jab as a vaccine , when it falls more in line with gene therapy? Maybe trying to ride the coattail of the lack of liability that goes along with vaccines, due to the act of 1986?
Part B: Additional Remedies – Sets forth procedures under which the person who filed a petition for compensation under the program may elect to file a civil action for damages.
Provides that no vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death: (1) resulting from unavoidable side effects; or (2) solely due to the manufacturer’s failure to provide direct warnings. Provides that a manufacturer may be held liable where: (1) such manufacturer engaged in the fraudulent or intentional withholding of information; or (2) such manufacturer failed to exercise due care. Permits punitive damages in such civil actions under certain circumstances.
There is no “withholding of information” when medical professionals are not fully educated on immunology and vaccinology. An uninformed doctor cannot give true informed consent.
Tone and intent certainly don’t come across in text, but if you talk to me, you understand I share this sort of information out of love, attempting to save anyone heartache of injury. Not rare, just rarely reported (drs are not taught how to report them and parents of injured children are often gaslighted). Now that injuries are making headlines (ex. Bell’s Palsy), they are attempting to normalize them. Not cool.
“We vaccinate and we’re fine.”
Read 13.1 on every vax insert and also ask where the sudden rise in autoimmune issues, etc. could possibly stem from… especially after the act of 1986, relieving pharma from liability and the subsequent￼ rise in vaxs??
If nothing else, take the time to read ingredients and ask if it would be okay to ingest —> much less inject <— this toxic brew, bypassing our God-given immune systems?
Ingredients include: aborted fetal cells (yes, an entire genome has been found), E. Coli, polysorbate 80 & 20, monkey kidney cells, Formaldehyde, insect cells, aluminum, barium, latex rubber, dog kidney, Calf serum, neomycin, egg components, peanut and soy bean oil, etc, etc…￼￼
“But at least we don’t have Polio!”
Read Dissolving Illusions with Dr. Suzanne Humphries for a better perspective of vax history. Polio has simply been reclassified —> transverse myelitis, AFM, Guillain-Barré syndrome. “But we don’t have iron lungs anymore.” -> Ventilators.
“But Dr. Humphries is an anti-vax quack.”
Yeah… Google is not our friend. 😉 That’s what they want us to think. She changed her perspective on vaccines after listening to her patients, seeing the damage first-hand. THEN she researched the information they DON’T teach in med school. There is nothing in it for drs who speak out. If anything, their careers are on the line. Those are the voices we should be listening to…
“But we should trust the scientists.”
Have you ever heard of whistleblower Dr. William Thompson? Rep. Bill Posey has tried, but Congress still refuses to subpoena￼ Thompson. The Vaxxed documentaries give a quick little history on his eyewitness account of the CDC destroying data (which showed black boys getting autism at extremely high rates). Scientists destroyed data that could save MANY people from injury!
How I wish I were wrong about all of this… Research, don’t regret. I have plenty on my “resources” page to get you started! Blessings!
Here are a few highlights from the study regarding Dr. :
“Cumulative office visits in the vaccinated (orange) vs. unvaccinated (blue) patients born into the practice…”
“The implications of these results for the net public health effects of whole-population vaccination and with respect for informed consent on human health are compelling.”
“The data shown are for the Relative Incidence of Office Visits (RIOVs) to average incidence ratio of billed office visits related to fever in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated (OVV/OVUV) conditions and for “Well Child” visit on the right.”
“We can conclude that the unvaccinated children in this practice are not, overall, less healthy than the vaccinated and that indeed the vaccinated children appear to be significantly less healthy than the unvaccinated…”
“Further research involving larger, independent samples is needed to verify and understand these unexpected findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on children’s health.”
“Unintended and nonspecific consequences of vaccination, such as increased risk of chronic health conditions from vaccine exposures, must also be examined…”
“This research was funded by donations from the public to
The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge…
None of the donors had any input into the scope or design of the study or the decision to publish. IPAK is a not-for-profit research organization.”
“As a GP with more than 50 years experience in treating children and their families, I feel it my duty to speak out against the new vaccine mandates, for three main reasons. The first is that there is no emergency to justify vaccinating children against their parents’ wishes, let alone keeping them out of school if they refuse. The second is that the research cited to prove that vaccines are safe and effective falls far short of the rigorous standards that valid medical science must follow. The third is that the Nuremberg Code and the Helsinki Declaration, both of which we helped write and still profess to abide by, explicitly forbid any medical procedure, treatment, or experiment undertaken without the fully-informed consent of the recipient.”
–Richard Moskowitz, M. D.
• There is no emergency
• Claims that vaccines are safe and effective are deceptive
• The vaccine manufacturers design the safety trials
• There is evidence of harm
• Human rights are under attack
• The politics behind the mandates are upside-down
Why is it that every single medication is KNOWN to have side effects, yet we DENY that vaccines have side effects?
Were you shown/given/read a VIS (Vaccine Information Statement) at your child’s appointment? https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/vis/current-vis.html
According to the NCVIA, it is required that your doctor use a VIS, making you aware of the “benefits” and risks PRIOR to each vax. Statements are “written at a 10th grade reading level” — as a courtesy for those of us without a PhD, I’m sure. I digress…
Each “informed consent” story I hear or read seems the same. Doctors believe benefits outweigh any risk. If your child is injured, your doctor may refuse treatment for pointing to the biological weapon that caused said injury… and you will be laughed out the door.
We’ve gone from 12.8% chronic illness in the 1980s when our children got 11 vaccines to now 54% of our children with chronic illness now that we get 54 vaccines. -Del Bigtree
Were you informed that the synthetic Vit K jab comes with a black box warning? Were you informed that SIDS and autism are listed on the DTaP insert?
How can an uninformed doctor (unaware of ingredients and potential adverse effects) give TRUE informed consent?
Ignorance may be (temporary) bliss, but knowledge is power. If you haven’t begun the rabbit hole of research, this is your invitation. We can’t afford to blindly trust. When the blind lead the blind, injury is sure to follow.
How “informed” were you?