Top 10 reasons why I will NOT be getting the “Wacky Tacky”

and why no one should EVER get it! -- list compiled by Kevin via ig: @kingkat2.0

1. Jab makers are immune from liability.

The only industry in the world that bears no liability for injuries or deaths resulting from their products are jab makers. First established in 1986 with the NCVIA of 1986, and reinforced by the PREP Act. Jab makers cannot be sued, even if they are shown to be negligent. Jab makers are allowed to create a one-size-fits-all product, with no testing on sub-populations (i.e. people with specific health conditions), and yet they are unwilling to accept responsibility for any adverse reactions or deaths their products cause. If a company is not willing to stand behind their product as safe, especially on they rushed to market and skipped animal trials on, I am not willing to take a chance on their product.

 

2. Questionable history of distributing companies of the jab.

Three of the 4 c-19 jab makers have been sued for products they brought to market even though they knew injuries and deaths would result.  For instance...

 



3. History of attempts to make a "roon@  virus" jab.

There have been numerous attempts at making a viral jab that ended in utter failure. The first attempt was in the 60's, where scientists tried to make an RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) jab for infants; where they skipped the animal trials simply because in the 60's it wasn't required. * in 2004, attempted jab produced hepatitis in ferrets. *in 2005, mice and civets became sick and more susceptible to "rona viruses" after being jabbed. *in 2012, the ferrets became sick and died. In this study, mice and ferrets developed lung disease. *in 2016, this study also produced lung disease in mice. NOTE: When children and animals were exposed to the virus, an unexplained phenomenon called (ADE) Antibody Dependent Enhancement, aka VED occurred. This is where the body created a cytokine storm -- an extreme attack on the body where both animal and children died.

4. No long-term safety testing.

With products that have only been on the market at the time a few months, we had no long-term safety data. In other words, we have no idea what this product will do in the body months or years from now - for ANY population. However... as the year progressed, we are getting a plethora of stories of people dropping dead suddenly!

5. No informed consent.

What most who are taking the jab don't know is that because these products are still in clinical trials, anyone who gets the shot is now part of the clinical trial. They are part of the experiment. Those (like me) who do not take it, were and are part of the control group.

6. Under-reporting of adverse reactions and death.

According to a study done by Harvard (at the commission of our own government), less than 1% of all adverse reactions to the jab are actually submitted to VAERS. (See page 6 of ICANDECIDE.ORG)

7. Injuries.

At the time of this writing, VAERS reports over 29,000 (this is just from what they reported) deaths from the current c19 jab, as well as close to 100,000 adverse reactions. At the time between Dec 2020 to March of last year. "VAERS data released today showed 50,861 reports of adverse events following c19 jab, including 2,249 deaths and 7,726 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and March 26, 2021." Search Results from the VAERS Database (medalerts.org)

8.The jabs do not stop transmission or infection.

I'll take my chances with my own God-given immune system, thank you very much!

9. My favorite! Those who get the jab still tested positive for the "big C." 

example: Biden. (Don't get me started on the pcr test. Another post for another day. --Crisie)

10. Geert Vanden Bossche and Dr. Sherri TenPenny.

A Biblical Response: We can warn and sound the alarm, but people will still do what they want. Our response should be love. Love for God, family & friends. 1 Corinthians 13:6 -- Love rejoices in the truth. Many people hate truth, so they don't truly have love within them.  Verse 7 says "love never gives up, never loses faith, is always hopeful, and endures through every circumstance."

 

honor their memory by speaking TRUTH

If truly seen as casualties for the greater good in the medical community, there would be days set aside to honor their sacrifice. Instead, we simply honor their memories by speaking truth. Covid-19 Vaccine Reactions (covidvaccinereactions.com) Simone Scott: 19-year-old Northwestern University freshman develops myocarditis, receives heart transplant, dead six weeks after second Moderna mRNA injection - The COVID Blog If you, or someone you know, is injured, please report it.

{NOT} safe

Because I’m getting questions about Rona-jab safety during pregnancy. ⠀ ⠀ Two words: Not. Safe. ⠀ If/when I come across the specific VAERS source link again, I'll update! (This IG post didn’t make it to the website before my IG account was Zuckerberged. Sigh...) This... and so many more. Lord, help us.

webster changes the definition of “vaccine”

Merriam-Webster dictionary has quietly changed the definition of the term ‘vaccine’ to include components of the COVID-19 mRNA injection. The definition of vaccine was specifically changed due to the COVID-19 injection.

The definition of ‘vaccine’ as of February 5th 2021:

The definition of ‘vaccine’ as of February 6th 2021:

A vaccine used to be “a preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease”, meaning it had nothing to do with mRNA injections, which are not live vaccines and do not use an infectious element.

Why do you suppose they are working so hard to classify the corona jab as a vaccine , when it falls more in line with gene therapy? Maybe trying to ride the coattail of the lack of liability that goes along with vaccines, due to the act of 1986?
Part B: Additional Remedies - Sets forth procedures under which the person who filed a petition for compensation under the program may elect to file a civil action for damages. Provides that no vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death: (1) resulting from unavoidable side effects; or (2) solely due to the manufacturer's failure to provide direct warnings. Provides that a manufacturer may be held liable where: (1) such manufacturer engaged in the fraudulent or intentional withholding of information; or (2) such manufacturer failed to exercise due care. Permits punitive damages in such civil actions under certain circumstances.

There is no "withholding of information" when medical professionals are not fully educated on immunology and vaccinology.  An uninformed doctor cannot give true informed consent.

https://www.nvic.org/injury-compensation/origihanlaw.aspx

https://theredelephants.com/merriam-webster-dictionary-quietly-changes-definition-of-vaccine-to-include-covid-19-mrna-injection/

Vaccine | Definition of Vaccine by Merriam-Webster

Remember, THIS is with LESS THAN 1% of injuries being reported... openvaers.com

 

we {tried} to warn you

We can all just check our brains at the door and allow them to do all of the thinking for us, or we can recall who is pushing these experimental vaccines on EVERYONE (Biden is on a mission) and remember they are NOT LIABLE FOR ANYTHING that happens to you.
And instead of proving safety, the CDC would rather make a slide presentation to boost confidence, touting safety and effectiveness. Lord, help us. -->> Vaccinate with Confidence Tips for the Healthcare Team
And the government would rather invest $1 BILLION to strengthen confidence in the vaccine program, again... instead of proving safety and effectiveness.
Pfizer
AstraZeneca
There's a reason they do NOT want people sharing their injuries online:
If we can convince others that big government does not care, and pHARMa is in the business of wealth, not health (not to be confused with urgent, lifesaving care), and the "church" doesn't hold our best interest... all other dominoes of cognitive dissonance fall more readily.

"I'm telling people to treat their vaccinated and vaccine-injured friends and family as though they are in hospice. Yes, miracles can happen in hospice, and maybe they'll be lucky, but the covid shot is a ticking timebomb." -Dr. Sherri Tenpenny
If we can convince others that big government does not care, and pHARMa is in the business of wealth, not health (not to be confused with urgent, lifesaving care), and the "church" doesn't hold our best interest... all other dominoes of cognitive dissonance fall more readily. Contrary to popular belief, there are no "FDA-approved" COVID-19 vaccines. The FDA allowed the distribution and use of Moderna's "experimental" mRNA-1273 vaccine and Pfizer/BioNTech's "experimental" BNT162b2 vaccine under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). This means that, if you decide to get one of these two vaccines, you are agreeing to be part of a human medical experiment.
When the professions of Public Health and Medicine collude to do away with TRUE informed consent, they become a threat to every individual.
And just how will we know for sure that when someone develops autoimmune disorders, cancers, infertility, or other health problems down the road they are, or are not, associated with these novel gene therapy biologics? They are ERASING ALL EVIDENCE of the ability to compare vaxxed vs unvaxxed. No immediate reactions does NOT mean no long-term consequences. How convenient.  -->> Moderna And Pfizer Vaccine Studies Hampered As Placebo Recipients Get Real Shot
Rona vax injury reports -->> Search Results from the VAERS Database
Schools close due to reactions:
The shots will just keep coming. When it comes to Bill Gates, how do we vote out someone we didn't vote in? Population control is real.
This isn't a prideful "We told you so" moment, but rather... a heartbreaking,  "We tried to warn you."
@woketxmama

don’t be {selfish}

Have you ever had a negative reaction to a medication?
What did you do? You stopped taking it, and your doctor noted it in your file. You were likely told not to ever take that medication again. If you have a negative reaction to a vaccine, your doctor MAY say, “You shouldn’t take this again, and you probably shouldn’t take any medications LIKE this again.” It may or may not be noted in your file.
Your doctor may also say, “That’s impossible. That doesn’t happen. It’s coincidence.”
There are often differences in how doctors handle reactions, depending on whether it’s an oral medication or a vaccine. Part of this difference may be due to the fact that insurance reimbursement and yearly bonuses are tied to the percentage of vaccine uptake in the practice.
There’s another major difference here.
You can stop taking an oral medication.
You can never un-vaccinate.
Let that sink in.
With the brand new Covid vaccine, using brand new technology, if something happens to you, you cannot sue the manufacturer. You can’t sue the doctor. You can’t sue the nurse who stuck it in your arm.
You’re on your own.
Here is what I would suggest:
If you choose to get the shot, please talk to your friends and family members first. Let them know your plans for long-term care, and how you will pay for it. Ask them if they will be willing to care for you for the rest of your life, if something happens. Ask if they will be willing to give up their career and be with you 24/7 should you require it.
This decision doesn’t just affect you.
Please. Don’t be selfish. --- Marcella Piper-Terry

Safe & Effective… Hoax


 
Please read the fine print of this vax and decide for yourself:
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download? fbclid=IwAR1CaTeZDaeXTwZzcJfncaMviDxZ3LAx40thbLQjEWEOILSFFbm80Q6o3Yk






Dr. Roger Hodkinson, Chairman of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons committee in Ottawa, CEO of a large private medical laboratory in Edmonton, Alberta and Chairman of a Medical Biotechnology company SELLING THE COVID-19 TEST:

"There is utterly unfounded public hysteria driven by the media and politicians. This is the biggest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspected public. There is absolutely nothing that can be done to contain this virus. This is nothing more than a bad flu season. It's politics playing medicine and that's a very dangerous game. There is no action needed...Masks are utterly useless. There is no evidence whatsoever they are even effective. It is utterly ridiculous seeing these unfortunate, uneducated people walking around like lemmings obeying without any evidence. Social distancing is also useless... The risk of death under 65 is 1 in 300,000...response is utterly ridiculous."

vaxxed vs {un}vaxxed study

I FOUND IT!! I found the (Dr. Paul Thomas) study! It was a series of clicks and if you paid me, I probably couldn't do it again. Ha! Click to download the pdf file: https://res.mdpi.com/d_attachment/ijerph/ijerph-17-08674/article_deploy/ijerph-17-08674-v3.pdf Or if you prefer the link: Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination And... Pubmed! Here are a few highlights from the study regarding Dr. :

"Cumulative office visits in the vaccinated (orange) vs. unvaccinated (blue) patients born into the practice..." "The implications of these results for the net public health effects of whole-population vaccination and with respect for informed consent on human health are compelling." "The data shown are for the Relative Incidence of Office Visits (RIOVs) to average incidence ratio of billed office visits related to fever in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated (OVV/OVUV) conditions and for “Well Child” visit on the right." "We can conclude that the unvaccinated children in this practice are not, overall, less healthy than the vaccinated and that indeed the vaccinated children appear to be significantly less healthy than the unvaccinated..."

“Further research involving larger, independent samples is needed to verify and understand these unexpected findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on children’s health.”

"Unintended and nonspecific consequences of vaccination, such as increased risk of chronic health conditions from vaccine exposures, must also be examined..."

NO KIDDING!

"This research was funded by donations from the public to The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge...

None of the donors had any input into the scope or design of the study or the decision to publish. IPAK is a not-for-profit research organization."

Covid Vaccine is Female Sterilization –> Head of Pfizer

The vaccine contains a  spike protein (see image) called  syncytin-1, vital for the formation of human placenta in women. If the vaccine works so that we form an immune response AGAINST the spike protein, we are also training the female body to attack syncytin-1, which could lead to infertility in women of an unspecified duration. On December 1, 2020, the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42). Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies – for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – should not be continued until a study design is available that is suitable to address the significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned scientists against the vaccine and the study design.StarGate TV Series Warned Us In 2001 About the Vaccination Disaster Facing Us Today On the one hand, the petitioners demand that, due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used. This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se. Furthermore, they demand that it must be excluded, e.g. by means of animal experiments, that risks already known from previous studies, which partly originate from the nature of the corona viruses, can be realized. The concerns are directed in particular to the following points:
  • --The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.
    --The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women. --The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination. --The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.
CALL FOR HELP: Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon ask as many EU citizens as possible to co-sign their petition by sending the e-mail prepared here to the EMA. Source link:
Covid Vaccine is Female Sterilization – Head of Pfizer Research:

this was {never} about health

This started as a small Facebook post, but quickly snowballed. Deleting most of it, I decided to share it here instead. Facebook is rough for me these days, as well as, venturing out into the sea of masked faces. A constant reminder of how easily controlled the masses have become. Sigh... They are skipping animal trails (for the record, I don’t support animal testing either) and now seek to test children. Where do these children typically come from? Foster care. Lord, help us. https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/10/aap-wants-children-enrolled-in-covid-19-vaccine-clinical-trials/ What could go wrong? J & J recently halted their trail due to adverse effects.  For those who are aware of what is happening, this is not shocking news. Injuries are NOT rare. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/10/12/johnson-johnson-covid-19-vaccine-trial-paused-unexplained-illness/5975253002/ Gates says this will require (at least) 2 shots. If you watch the video, you might find yourself a bit distracted by his talking hands, like I was. Seriously. https://www.newswars.com/bill-gates-says-world-wont-return-to-normal-until-a-lot-of-people-take-a-second-covid-vaccine/ This was always about government overreach, never about our health. If they cared, they would stop systematically poisoning our air (just ask Bill Gates about that one), water, AND food. They would get back to finding sources of illness rather than treating symptoms. Think they wouldn’t knowingly poison us? I recommend watching the movie Dark Waters and the documentary which goes along with it, The Devil We Know. Okay... I'm pushing away from the computer now, listening to worship music and cleaning house... woketxmama