Author: admin

Research, Don’t Regret

Read the research. It's all we ask.

Tone and intent certainly don’t come across in text, but if you talk to me, you understand I share this sort of information out of love, attempting to save anyone heartache of injury. Not rare, just rarely reported (drs are not taught how to report them and parents of injured children are often gaslighted). Now that injuries are making headlines (ex. Bell’s Palsy), they are attempting to normalize them. Not cool.

“We vaccinate and we’re fine.”
Read 13.1 on every vax insert and also ask where the sudden rise in autoimmune issues, etc. could possibly stem from... especially after the act of 1986, relieving pharma from liability and the subsequent rise in vaxs??
If nothing else, take the time to read ingredients and ask if it would be okay to ingest —> much less inject <— this toxic brew, bypassing our God-given immune systems?
Ingredients include: aborted fetal cells (yes, an entire genome has been found), E. Coli, polysorbate 80 & 20, monkey kidney cells, Formaldehyde, insect cells, aluminum, barium, latex rubber, dog kidney, Calf serum, neomycin, egg components, peanut and soy bean oil, etc, etc...
“But at least we don’t have Polio!”
Read Dissolving Illusions with Dr. Suzanne Humphries for a better perspective of vax history. Polio has simply been reclassified —> transverse myelitis, AFM, Guillain-Barré syndrome. “But we don’t have iron lungs anymore.” -> Ventilators.
“But Dr. Humphries is an anti-vax quack.”
Yeah... Google is not our friend.  😉  That’s what they want us to think. She changed her perspective on vaccines after listening to her patients, seeing the damage first-hand. THEN she researched the information they DON’T teach in med school. There is nothing in it for drs who speak out. If anything, their careers are on the line. Those are the voices we should be listening to...
“But we should trust the scientists.”
Have you ever heard of whistleblower Dr. William Thompson? Rep. Bill Posey has tried, but Congress still refuses to subpoena Thompson. The Vaxxed documentaries give a quick little history on his eyewitness account of the CDC destroying data (which showed black boys getting autism at extremely high rates). Scientists destroyed data that could save MANY people from injury!
How I wish I were wrong about all of this... Research, don't regret. I have plenty on my "resources" page to get you started! Blessings!

Blind trust is dangerous science... Text exchange via: @beilersinlove

don’t be {selfish}

Have you ever had a negative reaction to a medication?
What did you do? You stopped taking it, and your doctor noted it in your file. You were likely told not to ever take that medication again. If you have a negative reaction to a vaccine, your doctor MAY say, “You shouldn’t take this again, and you probably shouldn’t take any medications LIKE this again.” It may or may not be noted in your file.
Your doctor may also say, “That’s impossible. That doesn’t happen. It’s coincidence.”
There are often differences in how doctors handle reactions, depending on whether it’s an oral medication or a vaccine. Part of this difference may be due to the fact that insurance reimbursement and yearly bonuses are tied to the percentage of vaccine uptake in the practice.
There’s another major difference here.
You can stop taking an oral medication.
You can never un-vaccinate.
Let that sink in.
With the brand new Covid vaccine, using brand new technology, if something happens to you, you cannot sue the manufacturer. You can’t sue the doctor. You can’t sue the nurse who stuck it in your arm.
You’re on your own.
Here is what I would suggest:
If you choose to get the shot, please talk to your friends and family members first. Let them know your plans for long-term care, and how you will pay for it. Ask them if they will be willing to care for you for the rest of your life, if something happens. Ask if they will be willing to give up their career and be with you 24/7 should you require it.
This decision doesn’t just affect you.
Please. Don’t be selfish. --- Marcella Piper-Terry

speaking of {infection} numbers…

We just looked at the CDC's total list of deaths per year  (I'm not splitting hair over the 2020 numbers -- I simply don't trust any of the rona cases, nor tests) -- let's look at the rate of possibility to "infect" someone with a virus. An analysis of risk by Bob Moran...
“First of all, given that you have no symptoms, what are the chances that you are infected with SARS-CoV-2? The UK Office of National Statistics estimates this to be 1 in 115, or 0.87%.  https://www.ons.gov.uk/.../coronaviruscovid19infec.../latest
Now, imagining you are infected, but you don’t have any symptoms, what is the probability that you will infect somebody else with SARS-CoV-2?  Recent studies show this is around 0.7%.  https://jamanetwork.com/.../jamanetwo.../fullarticle/2774102
If we multiply the probability of these two events, we can calculate the likelihood of you a) being infected & b) passing that infection on without symptoms. This gives a figure of 0.006%.  To put that figure in context, it’s roughly the same as your chance of dying in a car crash over the course of any given year.  http://www.bandolier.org.uk/booth/Risk/trasnsportpop.htmlBut if you infect someone, this doesn’t mean that they are going to end up dying of Covid pneumonia. Far from it, in fact. There is a lot of debate regarding the IFR of SARS-CoV-2, but the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine puts it at roughly 0.5%. (99.5% of infected people survive, even higher if you’re younger)  https://www.cebm.net/.../estimating-the-infection.../
Now, if we multiply the chance of infecting another person (without symptoms) by the fatality rate, we can estimate that the risk of “killing” one of your relatives is roughly 0.00003%, or 1 in 3 million.
Obviously there are a lot of caveats. If one of your relatives is very old and very ill, then the IFR is going to be higher. If they are relatively healthy, it’s going to be lower. But there’s another caveat. PCR tests. The first number we used (the number of infected individuals in the UK) is based on positive PCR results. It is possible that only 3% of these positive results are accurate. https://academic.oup.com/.../10.1093/cid/ciaa1491/5912603
Which means that the risk of a person “killing” a relative without any discernible coronavirus symptoms may well be as low as 1 in 30 million – the same sort of likelihood of you winning the National Lottery. Clearly, it is for individuals to assess risks for themselves and make decisions accordingly. But they should do so in the knowledge of how big those risks actually are. And nobody should be calling others “irresponsible” for taking a risk this minuscule.
Finally, this risk isn’t just the justification for ‘cancelling Christmas’, it’s the justification for all of it. Lockdowns, masks, school closures, undiagnosed cancers, suicides, stillbirths, unemployment. All done because we were told this specific risk was just too high.”
- Bob Moran of Bob's Cartoons
But... "Bob Moran is not a doctor or scientist." Nope. But, HERE'S ONE!  Sucharit Bhakdi is a Thai-German specialist in microbiology, having studied at the universities of Bonn, Giesen, Mainz, and Copenhagen.  He also studied at the Max Planck Institute Of Immunobiology And Epigenetics in Freiburg, and is a professor emeritus of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, and from 1991 to 2012 was head of the Institute Of Medical Microbiology & Hygiene.

Here’s the takeaway:

  • don’t blindly trust the media

  • masks and social distancing are pointless

  • COVID-19 is about as serious as influenza (which isn’t very serious)

  • a COVID-19 vaccine isn’t necessary

  • go back to living a normal life.

**disclaimer: ANY numbers reflecting infection/contagion via a virus makes the high assumption that viruses work the way we are being told. In the words of Dr. Mikovits, "dig deeper." p.s.  Asymptomatic = presenting no symptoms or evidence of illness or abnormality = HEALTHY!  

in a {REAL} pandemic…

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 (as of Nov) Even with Jan & December of 2020 added, the numbers do NOT justify a worldwide mandatory lockdown, mask, nor vaccine. Additionally, these numbers do not tell the whole story... Will history books include the death count to reflect those who died from suicide? loneliness? abuse?  flawed medical treatment? Will the truth be told about false positive tests? (coca-cola tested positive, for goodness sake) Or the fact that this virus has never been isolated?? (hint: you will not find the truth on the first page of google - dig deeper) Will history mention families angered by a doctored COD on death certificates? What about bribes for loved ones if they claim COD as "covid"?? I will never {EVER} trust a government which systematically poisons our air, food, and water.

"If it was truly a pandemic, no one would be talking about stats like this, trying to prove it was a pandemic. And you wouldn’t have to be tested to know you have it..." "In a real pandemic, medical professionals wouldn't have time for TikToks." "How will we know if the vaccine is working? Will the survival rate go from 99.7% to 99.8%?" "Give an inch and they take... everything!" "FEAR IS THE REAL VIRUS!" "For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind.” 2 Tim. 1:7 lying about numbers +++disclaimer: I am not denying that people have been sick with a virus. This is simply a gentle reminder that viruses mutate. It's what they do. Make common sense common again!

Safe & Effective… Hoax


 
Please read the fine print of this vax and decide for yourself:
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download? fbclid=IwAR1CaTeZDaeXTwZzcJfncaMviDxZ3LAx40thbLQjEWEOILSFFbm80Q6o3Yk






Dr. Roger Hodkinson, Chairman of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons committee in Ottawa, CEO of a large private medical laboratory in Edmonton, Alberta and Chairman of a Medical Biotechnology company SELLING THE COVID-19 TEST:

"There is utterly unfounded public hysteria driven by the media and politicians. This is the biggest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspected public. There is absolutely nothing that can be done to contain this virus. This is nothing more than a bad flu season. It's politics playing medicine and that's a very dangerous game. There is no action needed...Masks are utterly useless. There is no evidence whatsoever they are even effective. It is utterly ridiculous seeing these unfortunate, uneducated people walking around like lemmings obeying without any evidence. Social distancing is also useless... The risk of death under 65 is 1 in 300,000...response is utterly ridiculous."

  • IMG_6485
  • IMG_6486
  • IMG_6489
  • IMG_6488
  • IMG_6487
  • IMG_6491
  • IMG_6492

military vax mandate resources

First of all, thank you for your service! I am so sorry you have to fight freedom of body autonomy -- on top of war on the battlefield (another rabbit hole on its own). I digress. When it comes to vaxs, this is what I have gathered... So far (but we all know this is a slippery slope), they are not mandating the rona vax for military.  Each branch has their own policy, so I am unable to give a blanket "yes or no" answer on "mandatory vaxs" but here are a few resources to help you navigate and/or connect with others... Children's Health Defense: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/service-members-can-request-religious-exemptions-mandated-vaccines/ https://childrenshealthdefense.org/?s=Service+members Religious Accommodation Guide: https://u.pcloud.link/publink/show?code=8ab

@Military_freedom_keepers https://instagram.com/military_freedom_keepers?igshid=v8p9muqetkv4

Facebook Group:   "Military Vaccination Support" (use code words/symbols to help avoid censorship)

And, if nothing else, one dear follower suggested... “Make friends with the shot-giver. An army friend avoided the flu shot because they would lie for him.”

vaxxed vs {un}vaxxed study

I FOUND IT!! I found the (Dr. Paul Thomas) study! It was a series of clicks and if you paid me, I probably couldn't do it again. Ha! Click to download the pdf file: https://res.mdpi.com/d_attachment/ijerph/ijerph-17-08674/article_deploy/ijerph-17-08674-v3.pdf Or if you prefer the link: Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination And... Pubmed! Here are a few highlights from the study regarding Dr. :

"Cumulative office visits in the vaccinated (orange) vs. unvaccinated (blue) patients born into the practice..." "The implications of these results for the net public health effects of whole-population vaccination and with respect for informed consent on human health are compelling." "The data shown are for the Relative Incidence of Office Visits (RIOVs) to average incidence ratio of billed office visits related to fever in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated (OVV/OVUV) conditions and for “Well Child” visit on the right." "We can conclude that the unvaccinated children in this practice are not, overall, less healthy than the vaccinated and that indeed the vaccinated children appear to be significantly less healthy than the unvaccinated..."

“Further research involving larger, independent samples is needed to verify and understand these unexpected findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on children’s health.”

"Unintended and nonspecific consequences of vaccination, such as increased risk of chronic health conditions from vaccine exposures, must also be examined..."

NO KIDDING!

"This research was funded by donations from the public to The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge...

None of the donors had any input into the scope or design of the study or the decision to publish. IPAK is a not-for-profit research organization."

Brandy Vaughan

This one hits hard. RIP, Brandy Vaughn.You have been, and continue to be, an inspiration to many advocates who speak out for countless vax-injured families.You were right... “the darkness cannot win.” # be brave # for the children # truth always wins... ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ The post I wish didn’t have to write... by Brandy Vaughn
But given certain sudden tragedies over the last couple of years, I feel it’s absolutely necessary to post these ten facts...and please screenshot this for the record.
1. I’ve NEVER had any thoughts of taking my own life, not once, ever. Even before I had my son.
2. I have a huge mission in this life. Even when they make it very difficult and scary, I would NEVER take my own life. Period.
3. Bastien means everything to me and I would NEVER leave him. Period. I have sole custody and he needs me as much as I need him. I would NEVER think of leaving him for a second.
4. I have NEVER been on an anti-depressant nor been diagnosed as depressed — don’t believe it if you ever hear anything like this.
5. I’ve NEVER taken a daily pharmaceutical drug. And I haven’t taken any pharmaceuticals in 10 years (and ten years ago it was one pill, one day). Nothing over the counter, nothing by prescription. In other words, I’m not on anything that could kill me unexpectedly or suddenly. I’ve never done illegal drugs either. Not even once.
6. There’s no way anyone could get into my house, no robbers, no angry exes (which I don’t have btw), no fanatical people — my house is like Fort Knox...unless it was someone super professional. It just wouldn’t be possible for anyone without highly special equipment and tactics (I.e. remotely taking down my high-level security system, which they have done before, unfortunately). But my place is also highly secure in a hard-wired kinda way. So even if the power was out, most people could still never get in.
7. If something were to happen to me, it’s foul play and you know exactly who and why — given my work and mission in this life. I’m also NOT accident prone. And I got the highest health rating possible when I went through a battery of medical tests a couple of years ago for my life insurance policy.
8. If something were to happen to me, I have arranged for a close group of my friends to start a GoFundMe to hire a team of private investigators to figure out all the details (I have the team and have passed the info on to them). Oh, and money for a PR firm to make
It national news. There would be a press release sent to every journalist in this country (and more). It would not be swept under the rug, and it would be their worst nightmare.
9. There have been many on this mission or a similar one that have been killed and it’s time this bullshit stopped. The darkness cannot win.
10. I will NEVER stop speaking out for those who no longer can. Even if from the other side, where I imagine I would be FAR MORE powerful.
I have a team of angels surrounding me every step of this journey, but prayers of protection and love are ALWAYS appreciated.

Covid Vaccine is Female Sterilization –> Head of Pfizer

The vaccine contains a  spike protein (see image) called  syncytin-1, vital for the formation of human placenta in women. If the vaccine works so that we form an immune response AGAINST the spike protein, we are also training the female body to attack syncytin-1, which could lead to infertility in women of an unspecified duration. On December 1, 2020, the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42). Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies – for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – should not be continued until a study design is available that is suitable to address the significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned scientists against the vaccine and the study design.StarGate TV Series Warned Us In 2001 About the Vaccination Disaster Facing Us Today On the one hand, the petitioners demand that, due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used. This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se. Furthermore, they demand that it must be excluded, e.g. by means of animal experiments, that risks already known from previous studies, which partly originate from the nature of the corona viruses, can be realized. The concerns are directed in particular to the following points:
  • --The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.
    --The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women. --The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination. --The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.
CALL FOR HELP: Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon ask as many EU citizens as possible to co-sign their petition by sending the e-mail prepared here to the EMA. Source link:
Covid Vaccine is Female Sterilization – Head of Pfizer Research:

he said what he said

There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. I’ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines. You do not vaccinate people who aren't at risk from a disease. You also don't set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn't been extensively tested on human subjects. This much I know after 30 years in the pharmaceutical industry. Yet there are such moves afoot. One thought piece suggests that anyone who refuses vaccination should be subject to indefinite house arrest (Mellor et al, 2020). In some countries, there is talk of no jab, no job. There have even been job adverts for openings in NHS Wales for people to oversee the vaccination of the entire population.  Any such proposals are not only completely unnecessary but if done using any kind of coercion at all, ILLEGAL. -- Dr. Mike Yeadon - Ex Chief Scientific Officer and VP of Pfizer