Trust the sponsors… because they cArE.

Trust sCiEnCe, sPoNsOrS, iNvEsTiGaToRs, etc. They care about your health and have nothing to gain by the $ucce$$ of this eXpErImEnTaL vaccine. Adverse effects are rare. Besides, correlation does not equal causation. It’s for the gReAtEr g0oD. (Is THAT better, IG?)


Estimated Moderna study completion date: 10.27.22

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04470427

https://www.modernatx.com/about-us

Estimated Pfizer study completion date: 1.31.23

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728

https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data?fbclid=IwAR0WeHnIKlkmQI-YhbxMxFJhzRplIAnjI7ABV3lS0TuFkJcPwgj8X98gNhs

This is all akin to a fox guarding the henhouse, no?

Masks and Mask Wearing: 100 Facts You Must Know


1.  Surgeons have been using surgical masks since their introduction in 1897. It has for some years been customary for surgeons and nurses to wear surgical masks in the operating theatre and to change masks part of the way through any procedure lasting more than a few hours.  The dangers associated with mask wearing were assessed by five doctors and published in the journal Neurocirugia in 2008.

Although it is customary for operating theatres to be fitted with air conditioning systems, the writers of the article, entitled, Preliminary Report on Surgical Mask induced Deoxygenation During Major Surgery, pointed out that it is known that heat and moisture are trapped beneath surgical masks and concluded that ‘it seems reasonable that some of the exhaled carbon dioxide may also be trapped beneath them, inducing a decrease in blood oxygenation’.

A total of 53 surgeons, of both sexes, all employed at university hospitals and aged between 24 and 54 years of age were tested. All were non-smokers and none had any chronic lung disease. The test involved pulse oximetry before and after the course of an operation. The study showed that the longer a mask was worn the greater the fall in blood oxygen levels. This may lead to the individual passing out and it may also affect natural immunity – thereby increasing the risk of infection.  The masks used were disposable, sterile, one-way surgical paper masks. To eliminate the effect of dehydration over a several hour surgical operation, the surgeons were allowed after every hour to drink water through a straw.

The authors of the paper concluded that, ‘When the values for oxygen saturation of haemoglobin were compared, there were statistically significant differences only between preoperational and post operational values. As the duration of the operation increases, oxygen saturation of haemoglobin decreases significantly.’


2. This quote is taken from New England Journal of Medicine: ‘We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to covid-19 as face to face contact within six feet with a patient with symptomatic covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 20 minutes). The chance of catching covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.’ The reference is:  M.Klompas, C.Morris et al ‘Universal Masking in hospitals in the covid-19 era’ – New
England Journal of Medicine 2020


3. It is possible that wearing a mask for hours at a time could cause pulmonary fibrosis. In August 1988, the proceedings of the VIIth International Pneumoconioses Conference included details of three cases of pulmonary fibrosis, thought to be due to exposure to synthetic textile fibres. The first was a woman of 52 who had a dry cough with increasing  difficulty in breathing. Changes were visible on an X-ray. The woman had been working in a textile shop for 15 years where her job was measuring and cutting cloth – mainly synthetic materials. The second patient was a woman of 66 who also had difficulty in breathing. The lungs of this patient also showed X-ray changes. She was also involved in cutting and measuring synthetic fabrics. A third woman, aged 47, had bilateral pulmonary fibrosis. Studies have shown that loose fibres are seen on all types of masks and may be inhaled causing serious lung damage.

4.People who cough and sneeze into their mask increase the risk of a build-up of fungi and bacteria – which can lead to dangerous chest infections.

5. In 2015, the British Medical Journal published a paper entitled, A Cluster Randomized Trial of Cloth Masks Compared with Medical Masks in Healthcare Workers. The paper was written by nine authors from the University of New South Wales, the University of Sydney, the National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology in Vietnam and the Beijing Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in China. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of cloth masks to medical masks in hospital health care workers. The study, which was extensive, concluded that the results caution against the use of cloth masks.


‘This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety,’ concluded the authors. ‘Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.’  And the authors added: ‘…as a precautionary measure, cloth masks should not be recommended for health care workers, particularly in high risk situations, and guidelines need to be updated’.

For the remaining 95 facts, click here!
Source: Dr. Vernon Coleman

Why?


It’s easy to confuse wisdom with knowledge. Knowledge without wisdom is wasted. It’s akin to youth being wasted on the young, no? I digress…

How do we gain either, without asking questions? So. many. questions.

Let me ask this… Why do we trust?

If wearing a mask is mandatory because “it works” then why are we told to stand 6 feet apart? Why do we have to wear a mask? Is the virus  floating in the air or living on playground equipment? Why can’t you get it straight, CDC?

If mask wearing AND standing 6 feet apart work, why do we still have lockdowns? Why are small businesses closed, while the big chain stores allowed to remain open? Why does the virus target churches, but not Walmart? Why is this virus so stinkin’ smart?

If all THREE worked (masks, distancing, lockdowns) and things are getting better, why push a vaccine? If the vaccines are safe, why do manufacturers have ZERO liability? Why have they never been proven safe & effective, but yet they are marketed as such?

Why is it assumed that the “good” (treatment)  outweighs the “bad” (risks)? Why are we not seen as people… instead of a number? Why are truth seekers censored?

Why have we made Science, having no soul, our god? Why have we allowed science to profit from funding, without giving real answers?

Agendas, it seems, have endless pocketbooks. “But we should trust the scientists.” A lot of people have died at the hands of trusting the science. “Just take this pill for your ill.” Who cares what caused it… Why are they not held accountable for their crimes? Why are people we didn’t vote for making life-altering decisions for all?

Again… Why do we trust?

Knowledge is knowing the will of God. Wisdom is responding…

Laugh louder. Smile bigger. Hug longer. Share bolder
The world needs it right now.

Watch: Symptoms of Tyranny

woketxmama

a manipulative study


𝐈𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐬𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐝, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐰𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝𝐧’𝐭 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐩𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐯𝐚𝐱 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞. Instead of proving safety, Yale conducts a clinical trial on how to best manipulate the masses into compliance.

We will compare the reported willingness to get a C0 v I D – 1 9 vaccine at 3 and 6 months of it becoming available.” https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04460703
⠀⠀⠀
So, what are they testing??
Vaccine confidence scale: This scale will be used to assess the impact of the messages on vax confidence.
⠀⠀⠀ ⠀
Persuade others item: This is a measure of a willingness to persuade others to take the COVID-19 vaccine.

Fear of those who have not been vaccinated: This is a measure of a comfort with an unvaccinated individual visiting an elderly friend after a vax becomes available.
Social judgment of those who do not vaccinate: This is a scale composed of 4 items measuring the trustworthiness, selfishness, likeableness, and competence of those who choose not to get vaccinated after a vax becomes available.

TESTING:⠀⠀ ⠀
Yale University
New Haven, CT
𝐈𝐧𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐂𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐚: At least 18 years of age, US resident.
𝐄𝐱𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐂𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐚: Younger than 18 years of age, Non-US resident, Do not consent
⠀⠀⠀ ⠀
Again, could the message be any clearer? Shoving this vaccine agenda down. our. throats. It’s fine. I’m fine. Everything is fine.

woketxmama

“my duty to speak out”

“As a GP with more than 50 years experience in treating children and their families, I feel it my duty to speak out against the new vaccine mandates, for three main reasons. The first is that there is no emergency to justify vaccinating children against their parents’ wishes, let alone keeping them out of school if they refuse. The second is that the research cited to prove that vaccines are safe and effective falls far short of the rigorous standards that valid medical science must follow. The third is that the Nuremberg Code and the Helsinki Declaration, both of which we helped write and still profess to abide by, explicitly forbid any medical procedure, treatment, or experiment undertaken without the fully-informed consent of the recipient.
Richard Moskowitz, M. D.

In summary:

• There is no emergency
• Claims that vaccines are safe and effective are deceptive
• The vaccine manufacturers design the safety trials
• There is evidence of harm
• Human rights are under attack
• The politics behind the mandates are upside-down

Quote Source:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/the-jig-is-up/

“safe” vaccines

What do people mean when they demand a safer vaccine?
⠀⠀⠀ ⠀
Safe vaccine. That has always struck me as an oxymoron.
⠀⠀⠀ ⠀
Which ingredients should they leave in while making them safe? Truth is, they would need to be modified so much, we’d be forced to label them as something entirely different… if health was truly the end goal.
While I appreciate the petition for something safer, can we please stop asking for “safer vaccines” this year? Instead, we should be demanding transparency and freedom.
The only safe vaccine is a vaccine that is never used.  -James R. Shannon, National Institutes of Health
Cancer was practically unknown until cowpox vaccination began to be introduced. I have seen 200 cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person. -New York Press, Jan. 26, 1909, from a report by W.B. Clark
⠀⠀⠀ ⠀
A Shot in the Dark
https://youtu.be/B2N35yVQcSk

Things that make you go… hmmmmm.

woketxmama

The CDC owns HOW MANY vaccine patents?

It is the marketing department, not the science, that is driving the research.
-Dr. Drummond Rennie, Deputy Editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association

Safety testing, which typically requires five or more years for medical products, often lasts only a few days with vaccines (Heb B, for example, is only tested 4 or 5 days, depending on the manufacturer), not nearly long enough to spot cancers or chronic conditions like autoimmune disease (e.g., juvenile diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis), allergic illnesses (e.g., food allergies, allergic rhinitis, eczema, asthma), or neurological and neurodevelopmental injuries (e.g., ADD, ADHD, narcolepsy, epilepsy, seizure disorders, and autism).

The CDC owns 56 vaccine patents and buys and distributes $4.6 billion in vaccines annually through the Vaccines for Children program.

Question everything. Follow the money.

woketxmama

Source:

Americans Can Handle an Open Discussion on Vaccines—RFK, Jr. Responds to Criticism from His Family

Where is the science?

”The safety of CDC’s childhood vaccination schedule was never affirmed in clinical studies. Vaccines are administered to millions of infants every year, yet health authorities have no scientific data from synergistic toxicity studies on all combinations of vaccines that infants are likely to receive. National vaccination campaigns must be supported by scientific evidence. No child should be subjected to a health policy that is not based on sound scientific principles and, in fact, has been shown to be potentially dangerous.

Source:
Journal of American Physicians & Surgeons
Neil Z. Miller
Volume 21
Number 2
Summer 2016

Show us the science!

woketxmama