The Church of Modern Medicine

Murder by Vaccination with Eustace Mullins and “The Church of Modern Medicin3” with 4 “holy waters”: 1) Vaccination2) Fluoridation3) Silver Nitrate5) Intravenous feeding“Vaccination is really a time bomb within the human system that can go off 5 years, 10 years, 40 years after you have the vaccination… You can have a stroke, heart attack — because it’s always there in your system. You never get rid of it. And apparently, it’s always an alien force in your physique.” <— And this was before the rona jab“Modern medicine today is a $650 billion/year business.—> Keep in mind this video was posted 11 years ago.

Free pdf of Murder by Vaccination or order hard copy retail online. 😉

webster changes the definition of “vaccine”

Merriam-Webster dictionary has quietly changed the definition of the term ‘vaccine’ to include components of the COVID-19 mRNA injection. The definition of vaccine was specifically changed due to the COVID-19 injection.

The definition of ‘vaccine’ as of February 5th 2021:

The definition of ‘vaccine’ as of February 6th 2021:

A vaccine used to be “a preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease”, meaning it had nothing to do with mRNA injections, which are not live vaccines and do not use an infectious element.

Why do you suppose they are working so hard to classify the corona jab as a vaccine , when it falls more in line with gene therapy? Maybe trying to ride the coattail of the lack of liability that goes along with vaccines, due to the act of 1986?
Part B: Additional Remedies - Sets forth procedures under which the person who filed a petition for compensation under the program may elect to file a civil action for damages. Provides that no vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death: (1) resulting from unavoidable side effects; or (2) solely due to the manufacturer's failure to provide direct warnings. Provides that a manufacturer may be held liable where: (1) such manufacturer engaged in the fraudulent or intentional withholding of information; or (2) such manufacturer failed to exercise due care. Permits punitive damages in such civil actions under certain circumstances.

There is no "withholding of information" when medical professionals are not fully educated on immunology and vaccinology.  An uninformed doctor cannot give true informed consent.

Vaccine | Definition of Vaccine by Merriam-Webster

Remember, THIS is with LESS THAN 1% of injuries being reported...


{con}spiracy theories

Conspiracy theories will not be tolerated, you say??

But what qualifies as... or WHO (no pun intended, but it works) gets to quantify a “conspiracy theory”?? With so many of mine coming to light in 2020, I’m wondering if ANY “conspiracies” exist. 

Organizations or individuals who traffic in conspiracy theories, propaganda and lies to spread disinformation will not be tolerated, and we’ll work with the WHCA to decide how to handle those instances moving forward.” -Biden

They seek to drown out every voice but theirs. Do we really believe that the WHO listed “vax hesitancy” as a global health threat by coincidence?

THAT would be a conspiracy theory, right?!

Just like Bill Gates spraying us... but if you’ve been here for a minute, you’ve seen me talk about him.  Those lines in the sky are certainly NOT love letters to us.

And the health risks:

Who coined the term “conspiracy theory” again? 

It was the See-I-A that likely played the greatest role in effectively “weaponizing” the term. (research why --> had a little something to do with President JFK's assassination) Since the 1960s, the label has become a disciplinary device that has been effective in defining targeted events off limits to inquiry or debate.

Someone will always try to interpret this world for us. As followers of Christ, it’s our responsibility to filter everything through God, using wise discernment.

If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, which giveth to all men liberally, and reproacheth no man, and it shall be given him. -James 1:5 We certainly cannot trust in the government to fix the government... the only plan I'm trusting is God's.


speaking of {infection} numbers…

We just looked at the CDC's total list of deaths per year  (I'm not splitting hair over the 2020 numbers -- I simply don't trust any of the rona cases, nor tests) -- let's look at the rate of possibility to "infect" someone with a virus. An analysis of risk by Bob Moran...
“First of all, given that you have no symptoms, what are the chances that you are infected with SARS-CoV-2? The UK Office of National Statistics estimates this to be 1 in 115, or 0.87%.
Now, imagining you are infected, but you don’t have any symptoms, what is the probability that you will infect somebody else with SARS-CoV-2?  Recent studies show this is around 0.7%.
If we multiply the probability of these two events, we can calculate the likelihood of you a) being infected & b) passing that infection on without symptoms. This gives a figure of 0.006%.  To put that figure in context, it’s roughly the same as your chance of dying in a car crash over the course of any given year. if you infect someone, this doesn’t mean that they are going to end up dying of Covid pneumonia. Far from it, in fact. There is a lot of debate regarding the IFR of SARS-CoV-2, but the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine puts it at roughly 0.5%. (99.5% of infected people survive, even higher if you’re younger)
Now, if we multiply the chance of infecting another person (without symptoms) by the fatality rate, we can estimate that the risk of “killing” one of your relatives is roughly 0.00003%, or 1 in 3 million.
Obviously there are a lot of caveats. If one of your relatives is very old and very ill, then the IFR is going to be higher. If they are relatively healthy, it’s going to be lower. But there’s another caveat. PCR tests. The first number we used (the number of infected individuals in the UK) is based on positive PCR results. It is possible that only 3% of these positive results are accurate.
Which means that the risk of a person “killing” a relative without any discernible coronavirus symptoms may well be as low as 1 in 30 million – the same sort of likelihood of you winning the National Lottery. Clearly, it is for individuals to assess risks for themselves and make decisions accordingly. But they should do so in the knowledge of how big those risks actually are. And nobody should be calling others “irresponsible” for taking a risk this minuscule.
Finally, this risk isn’t just the justification for ‘cancelling Christmas’, it’s the justification for all of it. Lockdowns, masks, school closures, undiagnosed cancers, suicides, stillbirths, unemployment. All done because we were told this specific risk was just too high.”
- Bob Moran of Bob's Cartoons
But... "Bob Moran is not a doctor or scientist." Nope. But, HERE'S ONE!  Sucharit Bhakdi is a Thai-German specialist in microbiology, having studied at the universities of Bonn, Giesen, Mainz, and Copenhagen.  He also studied at the Max Planck Institute Of Immunobiology And Epigenetics in Freiburg, and is a professor emeritus of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, and from 1991 to 2012 was head of the Institute Of Medical Microbiology & Hygiene.

Here’s the takeaway:

  • don’t blindly trust the media

  • masks and social distancing are pointless

  • COVID-19 is about as serious as influenza (which isn’t very serious)

  • a COVID-19 vaccine isn’t necessary

  • go back to living a normal life.

**disclaimer: ANY numbers reflecting infection/contagion via a virus makes the high assumption that viruses work the way we are being told. In the words of Dr. Mikovits, "dig deeper." p.s.  Asymptomatic = presenting no symptoms or evidence of illness or abnormality = HEALTHY!  

in a {REAL} pandemic…

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 (as of Nov) Even with Jan & December of 2020 added, the numbers do NOT justify a worldwide mandatory lockdown, mask, nor vaccine. Additionally, these numbers do not tell the whole story... Will history books include the death count to reflect those who died from suicide? loneliness? abuse?  flawed medical treatment? Will the truth be told about false positive tests? (coca-cola tested positive, for goodness sake) Or the fact that this virus has never been isolated?? (hint: you will not find the truth on the first page of google - dig deeper) Will history mention families angered by a doctored COD on death certificates? What about bribes for loved ones if they claim COD as "covid"?? I will never {EVER} trust a government which systematically poisons our air, food, and water.

"If it was truly a pandemic, no one would be talking about stats like this, trying to prove it was a pandemic. And you wouldn’t have to be tested to know you have it..." "In a real pandemic, medical professionals wouldn't have time for TikToks." "How will we know if the vaccine is working? Will the survival rate go from 99.7% to 99.8%?" "Give an inch and they take... everything!" "FEAR IS THE REAL VIRUS!" "For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind.” 2 Tim. 1:7 lying about numbers +++disclaimer: I am not denying that people have been sick with a virus. This is simply a gentle reminder that viruses mutate. It's what they do. Make common sense common again!

Safe & Effective… Hoax

Please read the fine print of this vax and decide for yourself: fbclid=IwAR1CaTeZDaeXTwZzcJfncaMviDxZ3LAx40thbLQjEWEOILSFFbm80Q6o3Yk

Dr. Roger Hodkinson, Chairman of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons committee in Ottawa, CEO of a large private medical laboratory in Edmonton, Alberta and Chairman of a Medical Biotechnology company SELLING THE COVID-19 TEST:

"There is utterly unfounded public hysteria driven by the media and politicians. This is the biggest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspected public. There is absolutely nothing that can be done to contain this virus. This is nothing more than a bad flu season. It's politics playing medicine and that's a very dangerous game. There is no action needed...Masks are utterly useless. There is no evidence whatsoever they are even effective. It is utterly ridiculous seeing these unfortunate, uneducated people walking around like lemmings obeying without any evidence. Social distancing is also useless... The risk of death under 65 is 1 in 300,000...response is utterly ridiculous."

vaxxed vs {un}vaxxed study

I FOUND IT!! I found the (Dr. Paul Thomas) study! It was a series of clicks and if you paid me, I probably couldn't do it again. Ha! Click to download the pdf file: Or if you prefer the link: Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination And... Pubmed! Here are a few highlights from the study regarding Dr. :

"Cumulative office visits in the vaccinated (orange) vs. unvaccinated (blue) patients born into the practice..." "The implications of these results for the net public health effects of whole-population vaccination and with respect for informed consent on human health are compelling." "The data shown are for the Relative Incidence of Office Visits (RIOVs) to average incidence ratio of billed office visits related to fever in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated (OVV/OVUV) conditions and for “Well Child” visit on the right." "We can conclude that the unvaccinated children in this practice are not, overall, less healthy than the vaccinated and that indeed the vaccinated children appear to be significantly less healthy than the unvaccinated..."

“Further research involving larger, independent samples is needed to verify and understand these unexpected findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on children’s health.”

"Unintended and nonspecific consequences of vaccination, such as increased risk of chronic health conditions from vaccine exposures, must also be examined..."


"This research was funded by donations from the public to The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge...

None of the donors had any input into the scope or design of the study or the decision to publish. IPAK is a not-for-profit research organization."