honor their memory by speaking TRUTH

If truly seen as casualties for the greater good in the medical community, there would be days set aside to honor their sacrifice. Instead, we simply honor their memories by speaking truth. Covid-19 Vaccine Reactions (covidvaccinereactions.com) Simone Scott: 19-year-old Northwestern University freshman develops myocarditis, receives heart transplant, dead six weeks after second Moderna mRNA injection - The COVID Blog If you, or someone you know, is injured, please report it.

webster changes the definition of “vaccine”

Merriam-Webster dictionary has quietly changed the definition of the term ‘vaccine’ to include components of the COVID-19 mRNA injection. The definition of vaccine was specifically changed due to the COVID-19 injection.

The definition of ‘vaccine’ as of February 5th 2021:

The definition of ‘vaccine’ as of February 6th 2021:

A vaccine used to be “a preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease”, meaning it had nothing to do with mRNA injections, which are not live vaccines and do not use an infectious element.

Why do you suppose they are working so hard to classify the corona jab as a vaccine , when it falls more in line with gene therapy? Maybe trying to ride the coattail of the lack of liability that goes along with vaccines, due to the act of 1986?
Part B: Additional Remedies - Sets forth procedures under which the person who filed a petition for compensation under the program may elect to file a civil action for damages. Provides that no vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death: (1) resulting from unavoidable side effects; or (2) solely due to the manufacturer's failure to provide direct warnings. Provides that a manufacturer may be held liable where: (1) such manufacturer engaged in the fraudulent or intentional withholding of information; or (2) such manufacturer failed to exercise due care. Permits punitive damages in such civil actions under certain circumstances.

There is no "withholding of information" when medical professionals are not fully educated on immunology and vaccinology.  An uninformed doctor cannot give true informed consent.

https://www.nvic.org/injury-compensation/origihanlaw.aspx

https://theredelephants.com/merriam-webster-dictionary-quietly-changes-definition-of-vaccine-to-include-covid-19-mrna-injection/

Vaccine | Definition of Vaccine by Merriam-Webster

Remember, THIS is with LESS THAN 1% of injuries being reported... openvaers.com

 

we {tried} to warn you

We can all just check our brains at the door and allow them to do all of the thinking for us, or we can recall who is pushing these experimental vaccines on EVERYONE (Biden is on a mission) and remember they are NOT LIABLE FOR ANYTHING that happens to you.
And instead of proving safety, the CDC would rather make a slide presentation to boost confidence, touting safety and effectiveness. Lord, help us. -->> Vaccinate with Confidence Tips for the Healthcare Team
And the government would rather invest $1 BILLION to strengthen confidence in the vaccine program, again... instead of proving safety and effectiveness.
Pfizer
AstraZeneca
There's a reason they do NOT want people sharing their injuries online:
If we can convince others that big government does not care, and pHARMa is in the business of wealth, not health (not to be confused with urgent, lifesaving care), and the "church" doesn't hold our best interest... all other dominoes of cognitive dissonance fall more readily.

"I'm telling people to treat their vaccinated and vaccine-injured friends and family as though they are in hospice. Yes, miracles can happen in hospice, and maybe they'll be lucky, but the covid shot is a ticking timebomb." -Dr. Sherri Tenpenny
If we can convince others that big government does not care, and pHARMa is in the business of wealth, not health (not to be confused with urgent, lifesaving care), and the "church" doesn't hold our best interest... all other dominoes of cognitive dissonance fall more readily. Contrary to popular belief, there are no "FDA-approved" COVID-19 vaccines. The FDA allowed the distribution and use of Moderna's "experimental" mRNA-1273 vaccine and Pfizer/BioNTech's "experimental" BNT162b2 vaccine under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). This means that, if you decide to get one of these two vaccines, you are agreeing to be part of a human medical experiment.
When the professions of Public Health and Medicine collude to do away with TRUE informed consent, they become a threat to every individual.
And just how will we know for sure that when someone develops autoimmune disorders, cancers, infertility, or other health problems down the road they are, or are not, associated with these novel gene therapy biologics? They are ERASING ALL EVIDENCE of the ability to compare vaxxed vs unvaxxed. No immediate reactions does NOT mean no long-term consequences. How convenient.  -->> Moderna And Pfizer Vaccine Studies Hampered As Placebo Recipients Get Real Shot
Rona vax injury reports -->> Search Results from the VAERS Database
Schools close due to reactions:
The shots will just keep coming. When it comes to Bill Gates, how do we vote out someone we didn't vote in? Population control is real.
This isn't a prideful "We told you so" moment, but rather... a heartbreaking,  "We tried to warn you."
@woketxmama

don’t be {selfish}

Have you ever had a negative reaction to a medication?
What did you do? You stopped taking it, and your doctor noted it in your file. You were likely told not to ever take that medication again. If you have a negative reaction to a vaccine, your doctor MAY say, “You shouldn’t take this again, and you probably shouldn’t take any medications LIKE this again.” It may or may not be noted in your file.
Your doctor may also say, “That’s impossible. That doesn’t happen. It’s coincidence.”
There are often differences in how doctors handle reactions, depending on whether it’s an oral medication or a vaccine. Part of this difference may be due to the fact that insurance reimbursement and yearly bonuses are tied to the percentage of vaccine uptake in the practice.
There’s another major difference here.
You can stop taking an oral medication.
You can never un-vaccinate.
Let that sink in.
With the brand new Covid vaccine, using brand new technology, if something happens to you, you cannot sue the manufacturer. You can’t sue the doctor. You can’t sue the nurse who stuck it in your arm.
You’re on your own.
Here is what I would suggest:
If you choose to get the shot, please talk to your friends and family members first. Let them know your plans for long-term care, and how you will pay for it. Ask them if they will be willing to care for you for the rest of your life, if something happens. Ask if they will be willing to give up their career and be with you 24/7 should you require it.
This decision doesn’t just affect you.
Please. Don’t be selfish. --- Marcella Piper-Terry

speaking of {infection} numbers…

We just looked at the CDC's total list of deaths per year  (I'm not splitting hair over the 2020 numbers -- I simply don't trust any of the rona cases, nor tests) -- let's look at the rate of possibility to "infect" someone with a virus. An analysis of risk by Bob Moran...
“First of all, given that you have no symptoms, what are the chances that you are infected with SARS-CoV-2? The UK Office of National Statistics estimates this to be 1 in 115, or 0.87%.  https://www.ons.gov.uk/.../coronaviruscovid19infec.../latest
Now, imagining you are infected, but you don’t have any symptoms, what is the probability that you will infect somebody else with SARS-CoV-2?  Recent studies show this is around 0.7%.  https://jamanetwork.com/.../jamanetwo.../fullarticle/2774102
If we multiply the probability of these two events, we can calculate the likelihood of you a) being infected & b) passing that infection on without symptoms. This gives a figure of 0.006%.  To put that figure in context, it’s roughly the same as your chance of dying in a car crash over the course of any given year.  http://www.bandolier.org.uk/booth/Risk/trasnsportpop.htmlBut if you infect someone, this doesn’t mean that they are going to end up dying of Covid pneumonia. Far from it, in fact. There is a lot of debate regarding the IFR of SARS-CoV-2, but the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine puts it at roughly 0.5%. (99.5% of infected people survive, even higher if you’re younger)  https://www.cebm.net/.../estimating-the-infection.../
Now, if we multiply the chance of infecting another person (without symptoms) by the fatality rate, we can estimate that the risk of “killing” one of your relatives is roughly 0.00003%, or 1 in 3 million.
Obviously there are a lot of caveats. If one of your relatives is very old and very ill, then the IFR is going to be higher. If they are relatively healthy, it’s going to be lower. But there’s another caveat. PCR tests. The first number we used (the number of infected individuals in the UK) is based on positive PCR results. It is possible that only 3% of these positive results are accurate. https://academic.oup.com/.../10.1093/cid/ciaa1491/5912603
Which means that the risk of a person “killing” a relative without any discernible coronavirus symptoms may well be as low as 1 in 30 million – the same sort of likelihood of you winning the National Lottery. Clearly, it is for individuals to assess risks for themselves and make decisions accordingly. But they should do so in the knowledge of how big those risks actually are. And nobody should be calling others “irresponsible” for taking a risk this minuscule.
Finally, this risk isn’t just the justification for ‘cancelling Christmas’, it’s the justification for all of it. Lockdowns, masks, school closures, undiagnosed cancers, suicides, stillbirths, unemployment. All done because we were told this specific risk was just too high.”
- Bob Moran of Bob's Cartoons
But... "Bob Moran is not a doctor or scientist." Nope. But, HERE'S ONE!  Sucharit Bhakdi is a Thai-German specialist in microbiology, having studied at the universities of Bonn, Giesen, Mainz, and Copenhagen.  He also studied at the Max Planck Institute Of Immunobiology And Epigenetics in Freiburg, and is a professor emeritus of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, and from 1991 to 2012 was head of the Institute Of Medical Microbiology & Hygiene.

Here’s the takeaway:

  • don’t blindly trust the media

  • masks and social distancing are pointless

  • COVID-19 is about as serious as influenza (which isn’t very serious)

  • a COVID-19 vaccine isn’t necessary

  • go back to living a normal life.

**disclaimer: ANY numbers reflecting infection/contagion via a virus makes the high assumption that viruses work the way we are being told. In the words of Dr. Mikovits, "dig deeper." p.s.  Asymptomatic = presenting no symptoms or evidence of illness or abnormality = HEALTHY!  

in a {REAL} pandemic…

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 (as of Nov) Even with Jan & December of 2020 added, the numbers do NOT justify a worldwide mandatory lockdown, mask, nor vaccine. Additionally, these numbers do not tell the whole story... Will history books include the death count to reflect those who died from suicide? loneliness? abuse?  flawed medical treatment? Will the truth be told about false positive tests? (coca-cola tested positive, for goodness sake) Or the fact that this virus has never been isolated?? (hint: you will not find the truth on the first page of google - dig deeper) Will history mention families angered by a doctored COD on death certificates? What about bribes for loved ones if they claim COD as "covid"?? I will never {EVER} trust a government which systematically poisons our air, food, and water.

"If it was truly a pandemic, no one would be talking about stats like this, trying to prove it was a pandemic. And you wouldn’t have to be tested to know you have it..." "In a real pandemic, medical professionals wouldn't have time for TikToks." "How will we know if the vaccine is working? Will the survival rate go from 99.7% to 99.8%?" "Give an inch and they take... everything!" "FEAR IS THE REAL VIRUS!" "For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind.” 2 Tim. 1:7 lying about numbers +++disclaimer: I am not denying that people have been sick with a virus. This is simply a gentle reminder that viruses mutate. It's what they do. Make common sense common again!

Safe & Effective… Hoax


 
Please read the fine print of this vax and decide for yourself:
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download? fbclid=IwAR1CaTeZDaeXTwZzcJfncaMviDxZ3LAx40thbLQjEWEOILSFFbm80Q6o3Yk






Dr. Roger Hodkinson, Chairman of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons committee in Ottawa, CEO of a large private medical laboratory in Edmonton, Alberta and Chairman of a Medical Biotechnology company SELLING THE COVID-19 TEST:

"There is utterly unfounded public hysteria driven by the media and politicians. This is the biggest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspected public. There is absolutely nothing that can be done to contain this virus. This is nothing more than a bad flu season. It's politics playing medicine and that's a very dangerous game. There is no action needed...Masks are utterly useless. There is no evidence whatsoever they are even effective. It is utterly ridiculous seeing these unfortunate, uneducated people walking around like lemmings obeying without any evidence. Social distancing is also useless... The risk of death under 65 is 1 in 300,000...response is utterly ridiculous."

Covid Vaccine is Female Sterilization –> Head of Pfizer

The vaccine contains a  spike protein (see image) called  syncytin-1, vital for the formation of human placenta in women. If the vaccine works so that we form an immune response AGAINST the spike protein, we are also training the female body to attack syncytin-1, which could lead to infertility in women of an unspecified duration. On December 1, 2020, the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42). Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies – for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – should not be continued until a study design is available that is suitable to address the significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned scientists against the vaccine and the study design.StarGate TV Series Warned Us In 2001 About the Vaccination Disaster Facing Us Today On the one hand, the petitioners demand that, due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used. This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se. Furthermore, they demand that it must be excluded, e.g. by means of animal experiments, that risks already known from previous studies, which partly originate from the nature of the corona viruses, can be realized. The concerns are directed in particular to the following points:
  • --The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.
    --The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women. --The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination. --The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.
CALL FOR HELP: Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon ask as many EU citizens as possible to co-sign their petition by sending the e-mail prepared here to the EMA. Source link:
Covid Vaccine is Female Sterilization – Head of Pfizer Research:

he said what he said

There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. I’ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines. You do not vaccinate people who aren't at risk from a disease. You also don't set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn't been extensively tested on human subjects. This much I know after 30 years in the pharmaceutical industry. Yet there are such moves afoot. One thought piece suggests that anyone who refuses vaccination should be subject to indefinite house arrest (Mellor et al, 2020). In some countries, there is talk of no jab, no job. There have even been job adverts for openings in NHS Wales for people to oversee the vaccination of the entire population.  Any such proposals are not only completely unnecessary but if done using any kind of coercion at all, ILLEGAL. -- Dr. Mike Yeadon - Ex Chief Scientific Officer and VP of Pfizer