Top 10 reasons why I will NOT be getting the “Wacky Tacky”

and why no one should EVER get it! -- list compiled by Kevin via ig: @kingkat2.0

1. Jab makers are immune from liability.

The only industry in the world that bears no liability for injuries or deaths resulting from their products are jab makers. First established in 1986 with the NCVIA of 1986, and reinforced by the PREP Act. Jab makers cannot be sued, even if they are shown to be negligent. Jab makers are allowed to create a one-size-fits-all product, with no testing on sub-populations (i.e. people with specific health conditions), and yet they are unwilling to accept responsibility for any adverse reactions or deaths their products cause. If a company is not willing to stand behind their product as safe, especially on they rushed to market and skipped animal trials on, I am not willing to take a chance on their product.

 

2. Questionable history of distributing companies of the jab.

Three of the 4 c-19 jab makers have been sued for products they brought to market even though they knew injuries and deaths would result.  For instance...

 



3. History of attempts to make a "roon@  virus" jab.

There have been numerous attempts at making a viral jab that ended in utter failure. The first attempt was in the 60's, where scientists tried to make an RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) jab for infants; where they skipped the animal trials simply because in the 60's it wasn't required. * in 2004, attempted jab produced hepatitis in ferrets. *in 2005, mice and civets became sick and more susceptible to "rona viruses" after being jabbed. *in 2012, the ferrets became sick and died. In this study, mice and ferrets developed lung disease. *in 2016, this study also produced lung disease in mice. NOTE: When children and animals were exposed to the virus, an unexplained phenomenon called (ADE) Antibody Dependent Enhancement, aka VED occurred. This is where the body created a cytokine storm -- an extreme attack on the body where both animal and children died.

4. No long-term safety testing.

With products that have only been on the market at the time a few months, we had no long-term safety data. In other words, we have no idea what this product will do in the body months or years from now - for ANY population. However... as the year progressed, we are getting a plethora of stories of people dropping dead suddenly!

5. No informed consent.

What most who are taking the jab don't know is that because these products are still in clinical trials, anyone who gets the shot is now part of the clinical trial. They are part of the experiment. Those (like me) who do not take it, were and are part of the control group.

6. Under-reporting of adverse reactions and death.

According to a study done by Harvard (at the commission of our own government), less than 1% of all adverse reactions to the jab are actually submitted to VAERS. (See page 6 of ICANDECIDE.ORG)

7. Injuries.

At the time of this writing, VAERS reports over 29,000 (this is just from what they reported) deaths from the current c19 jab, as well as close to 100,000 adverse reactions. At the time between Dec 2020 to March of last year. "VAERS data released today showed 50,861 reports of adverse events following c19 jab, including 2,249 deaths and 7,726 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and March 26, 2021." Search Results from the VAERS Database (medalerts.org)

8.The jabs do not stop transmission or infection.

I'll take my chances with my own God-given immune system, thank you very much!

9. My favorite! Those who get the jab still tested positive for the "big C." 

example: Biden. (Don't get me started on the pcr test. Another post for another day. --Crisie)

10. Geert Vanden Bossche and Dr. Sherri TenPenny.

A Biblical Response: We can warn and sound the alarm, but people will still do what they want. Our response should be love. Love for God, family & friends. 1 Corinthians 13:6 -- Love rejoices in the truth. Many people hate truth, so they don't truly have love within them.  Verse 7 says "love never gives up, never loses faith, is always hopeful, and endures through every circumstance."

 

honor their memory by speaking TRUTH

If truly seen as casualties for the greater good in the medical community, there would be days set aside to honor their sacrifice. Instead, we simply honor their memories by speaking truth. Covid-19 Vaccine Reactions (covidvaccinereactions.com) Simone Scott: 19-year-old Northwestern University freshman develops myocarditis, receives heart transplant, dead six weeks after second Moderna mRNA injection - The COVID Blog If you, or someone you know, is injured, please report it.

webster changes the definition of “vaccine”

Merriam-Webster dictionary has quietly changed the definition of the term ‘vaccine’ to include components of the COVID-19 mRNA injection. The definition of vaccine was specifically changed due to the COVID-19 injection.

The definition of ‘vaccine’ as of February 5th 2021:

The definition of ‘vaccine’ as of February 6th 2021:

A vaccine used to be “a preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease”, meaning it had nothing to do with mRNA injections, which are not live vaccines and do not use an infectious element.

Why do you suppose they are working so hard to classify the corona jab as a vaccine , when it falls more in line with gene therapy? Maybe trying to ride the coattail of the lack of liability that goes along with vaccines, due to the act of 1986?
Part B: Additional Remedies - Sets forth procedures under which the person who filed a petition for compensation under the program may elect to file a civil action for damages. Provides that no vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death: (1) resulting from unavoidable side effects; or (2) solely due to the manufacturer's failure to provide direct warnings. Provides that a manufacturer may be held liable where: (1) such manufacturer engaged in the fraudulent or intentional withholding of information; or (2) such manufacturer failed to exercise due care. Permits punitive damages in such civil actions under certain circumstances.

There is no "withholding of information" when medical professionals are not fully educated on immunology and vaccinology.  An uninformed doctor cannot give true informed consent.

https://www.nvic.org/injury-compensation/origihanlaw.aspx

https://theredelephants.com/merriam-webster-dictionary-quietly-changes-definition-of-vaccine-to-include-covid-19-mrna-injection/

Vaccine | Definition of Vaccine by Merriam-Webster

Remember, THIS is with LESS THAN 1% of injuries being reported... openvaers.com

 

we {tried} to warn you

We can all just check our brains at the door and allow them to do all of the thinking for us, or we can recall who is pushing these experimental vaccines on EVERYONE (Biden is on a mission) and remember they are NOT LIABLE FOR ANYTHING that happens to you.
And instead of proving safety, the CDC would rather make a slide presentation to boost confidence, touting safety and effectiveness. Lord, help us. -->> Vaccinate with Confidence Tips for the Healthcare Team
And the government would rather invest $1 BILLION to strengthen confidence in the vaccine program, again... instead of proving safety and effectiveness.
Pfizer
AstraZeneca
There's a reason they do NOT want people sharing their injuries online:
If we can convince others that big government does not care, and pHARMa is in the business of wealth, not health (not to be confused with urgent, lifesaving care), and the "church" doesn't hold our best interest... all other dominoes of cognitive dissonance fall more readily.

"I'm telling people to treat their vaccinated and vaccine-injured friends and family as though they are in hospice. Yes, miracles can happen in hospice, and maybe they'll be lucky, but the covid shot is a ticking timebomb." -Dr. Sherri Tenpenny
If we can convince others that big government does not care, and pHARMa is in the business of wealth, not health (not to be confused with urgent, lifesaving care), and the "church" doesn't hold our best interest... all other dominoes of cognitive dissonance fall more readily. Contrary to popular belief, there are no "FDA-approved" COVID-19 vaccines. The FDA allowed the distribution and use of Moderna's "experimental" mRNA-1273 vaccine and Pfizer/BioNTech's "experimental" BNT162b2 vaccine under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). This means that, if you decide to get one of these two vaccines, you are agreeing to be part of a human medical experiment.
When the professions of Public Health and Medicine collude to do away with TRUE informed consent, they become a threat to every individual.
And just how will we know for sure that when someone develops autoimmune disorders, cancers, infertility, or other health problems down the road they are, or are not, associated with these novel gene therapy biologics? They are ERASING ALL EVIDENCE of the ability to compare vaxxed vs unvaxxed. No immediate reactions does NOT mean no long-term consequences. How convenient.  -->> Moderna And Pfizer Vaccine Studies Hampered As Placebo Recipients Get Real Shot
Rona vax injury reports -->> Search Results from the VAERS Database
Schools close due to reactions:
The shots will just keep coming. When it comes to Bill Gates, how do we vote out someone we didn't vote in? Population control is real.
This isn't a prideful "We told you so" moment, but rather... a heartbreaking,  "We tried to warn you."
@woketxmama

don’t be {selfish}

Have you ever had a negative reaction to a medication?
What did you do? You stopped taking it, and your doctor noted it in your file. You were likely told not to ever take that medication again. If you have a negative reaction to a vaccine, your doctor MAY say, “You shouldn’t take this again, and you probably shouldn’t take any medications LIKE this again.” It may or may not be noted in your file.
Your doctor may also say, “That’s impossible. That doesn’t happen. It’s coincidence.”
There are often differences in how doctors handle reactions, depending on whether it’s an oral medication or a vaccine. Part of this difference may be due to the fact that insurance reimbursement and yearly bonuses are tied to the percentage of vaccine uptake in the practice.
There’s another major difference here.
You can stop taking an oral medication.
You can never un-vaccinate.
Let that sink in.
With the brand new Covid vaccine, using brand new technology, if something happens to you, you cannot sue the manufacturer. You can’t sue the doctor. You can’t sue the nurse who stuck it in your arm.
You’re on your own.
Here is what I would suggest:
If you choose to get the shot, please talk to your friends and family members first. Let them know your plans for long-term care, and how you will pay for it. Ask them if they will be willing to care for you for the rest of your life, if something happens. Ask if they will be willing to give up their career and be with you 24/7 should you require it.
This decision doesn’t just affect you.
Please. Don’t be selfish. --- Marcella Piper-Terry

speaking of {infection} numbers…

We just looked at the CDC's total list of deaths per year  (I'm not splitting hair over the 2020 numbers -- I simply don't trust any of the rona cases, nor tests) -- let's look at the rate of possibility to "infect" someone with a virus. An analysis of risk by Bob Moran...
“First of all, given that you have no symptoms, what are the chances that you are infected with SARS-CoV-2? The UK Office of National Statistics estimates this to be 1 in 115, or 0.87%.  https://www.ons.gov.uk/.../coronaviruscovid19infec.../latest
Now, imagining you are infected, but you don’t have any symptoms, what is the probability that you will infect somebody else with SARS-CoV-2?  Recent studies show this is around 0.7%.  https://jamanetwork.com/.../jamanetwo.../fullarticle/2774102
If we multiply the probability of these two events, we can calculate the likelihood of you a) being infected & b) passing that infection on without symptoms. This gives a figure of 0.006%.  To put that figure in context, it’s roughly the same as your chance of dying in a car crash over the course of any given year.  http://www.bandolier.org.uk/booth/Risk/trasnsportpop.htmlBut if you infect someone, this doesn’t mean that they are going to end up dying of Covid pneumonia. Far from it, in fact. There is a lot of debate regarding the IFR of SARS-CoV-2, but the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine puts it at roughly 0.5%. (99.5% of infected people survive, even higher if you’re younger)  https://www.cebm.net/.../estimating-the-infection.../
Now, if we multiply the chance of infecting another person (without symptoms) by the fatality rate, we can estimate that the risk of “killing” one of your relatives is roughly 0.00003%, or 1 in 3 million.
Obviously there are a lot of caveats. If one of your relatives is very old and very ill, then the IFR is going to be higher. If they are relatively healthy, it’s going to be lower. But there’s another caveat. PCR tests. The first number we used (the number of infected individuals in the UK) is based on positive PCR results. It is possible that only 3% of these positive results are accurate. https://academic.oup.com/.../10.1093/cid/ciaa1491/5912603
Which means that the risk of a person “killing” a relative without any discernible coronavirus symptoms may well be as low as 1 in 30 million – the same sort of likelihood of you winning the National Lottery. Clearly, it is for individuals to assess risks for themselves and make decisions accordingly. But they should do so in the knowledge of how big those risks actually are. And nobody should be calling others “irresponsible” for taking a risk this minuscule.
Finally, this risk isn’t just the justification for ‘cancelling Christmas’, it’s the justification for all of it. Lockdowns, masks, school closures, undiagnosed cancers, suicides, stillbirths, unemployment. All done because we were told this specific risk was just too high.”
- Bob Moran of Bob's Cartoons
But... "Bob Moran is not a doctor or scientist." Nope. But, HERE'S ONE!  Sucharit Bhakdi is a Thai-German specialist in microbiology, having studied at the universities of Bonn, Giesen, Mainz, and Copenhagen.  He also studied at the Max Planck Institute Of Immunobiology And Epigenetics in Freiburg, and is a professor emeritus of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, and from 1991 to 2012 was head of the Institute Of Medical Microbiology & Hygiene.

Here’s the takeaway:

  • don’t blindly trust the media

  • masks and social distancing are pointless

  • COVID-19 is about as serious as influenza (which isn’t very serious)

  • a COVID-19 vaccine isn’t necessary

  • go back to living a normal life.

**disclaimer: ANY numbers reflecting infection/contagion via a virus makes the high assumption that viruses work the way we are being told. In the words of Dr. Mikovits, "dig deeper." p.s.  Asymptomatic = presenting no symptoms or evidence of illness or abnormality = HEALTHY!  

in a {REAL} pandemic…

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 (as of Nov) Even with Jan & December of 2020 added, the numbers do NOT justify a worldwide mandatory lockdown, mask, nor vaccine. Additionally, these numbers do not tell the whole story... Will history books include the death count to reflect those who died from suicide? loneliness? abuse?  flawed medical treatment? Will the truth be told about false positive tests? (coca-cola tested positive, for goodness sake) Or the fact that this virus has never been isolated?? (hint: you will not find the truth on the first page of google - dig deeper) Will history mention families angered by a doctored COD on death certificates? What about bribes for loved ones if they claim COD as "covid"?? I will never {EVER} trust a government which systematically poisons our air, food, and water.

"If it was truly a pandemic, no one would be talking about stats like this, trying to prove it was a pandemic. And you wouldn’t have to be tested to know you have it..." "In a real pandemic, medical professionals wouldn't have time for TikToks." "How will we know if the vaccine is working? Will the survival rate go from 99.7% to 99.8%?" "Give an inch and they take... everything!" "FEAR IS THE REAL VIRUS!" "For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind.” 2 Tim. 1:7 lying about numbers +++disclaimer: I am not denying that people have been sick with a virus. This is simply a gentle reminder that viruses mutate. It's what they do. Make common sense common again!

Safe & Effective… Hoax


 
Please read the fine print of this vax and decide for yourself:
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download? fbclid=IwAR1CaTeZDaeXTwZzcJfncaMviDxZ3LAx40thbLQjEWEOILSFFbm80Q6o3Yk






Dr. Roger Hodkinson, Chairman of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons committee in Ottawa, CEO of a large private medical laboratory in Edmonton, Alberta and Chairman of a Medical Biotechnology company SELLING THE COVID-19 TEST:

"There is utterly unfounded public hysteria driven by the media and politicians. This is the biggest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspected public. There is absolutely nothing that can be done to contain this virus. This is nothing more than a bad flu season. It's politics playing medicine and that's a very dangerous game. There is no action needed...Masks are utterly useless. There is no evidence whatsoever they are even effective. It is utterly ridiculous seeing these unfortunate, uneducated people walking around like lemmings obeying without any evidence. Social distancing is also useless... The risk of death under 65 is 1 in 300,000...response is utterly ridiculous."