Proof that Masks Do More Harm than Good


Truths about Masks that Politicians and the BBC Probably Forgot to Mention


1) Face masks have been proven to do harm but not proven to do good. Forcing citizens to wear them is a form of oppression. Support for mask wearing comes from individuals promoting face masks for political rather than health reasons. There is now considerable support for masks to be worn out of doors and even in the home. There is absolutely no scientific reason for this.
2) Over a dozen scientific papers show clearly that masks are ineffective in preventing the movement of infective organisms. They also reduce oxygen levels and expose wearers to increased levels of carbon dioxide.
3) Nine medical authors from Australia and Vietnam studied cloth face masks and concluded that cloth masks should not be recommended for health care workers.

4) Wearing a mask for long periods could cause pulmonary fibrosis. Loose fibres are seen on all types of masks and may be inhaled causing serious lung damage.
5) Researchers in France proved that wearing a surgical mask causes breathlessness.
6) Masks should be changed every couple of hours and old masks should be disposed of safely. If cloth masks are worn, they should be washed at high temperatures twice a day. Disposable masks should be discarded after one use. (Masks thrown down in the street are a serious health hazard.)
7) Evidence proving the danger and ineffectiveness of masks has been banned, blocked or deleted. Discussion and debate about the value of face masks is suppressed.
8) In September 2020, 70 Belgian doctors claimed that mandatory face masks in schools are a major threat to child development.
9) A leading German virologist claims that face masks are a wonderful breeding ground for bacteria and fungi.
10) Dentists in New York have reported that mask wearing causes gum disease and dental cavities. The dentists say that face coverings lead to mouth dryness and an increase in the build-up of bacteria.
11) Exemption certificates/cards can be obtained online for those who are unable to wear a mask.
12) Some face masks may have pores five thousand times larger than virus particles.
13) Masks should never be touched once in place. If a mask is touched it must be replaced immediately.
14) No one should wear a mask while exercising. There have been several reports of masked children dying while exercising. There is evidence showing that mask wearing reduces blood oxygen levels even when the wearer is standing still. Individuals who exercise are likely to sweat. Masks then become damp more quickly and the damp promotes the growth of microorganisms.
15) There is a risk that viruses may accumulate in the fabric of a mask – thereby increasing the amount of the virus being inhaled.
16) Putting a mask on a baby or unconscious patient is dangerous. The mask may result in the wearer choking on vomit.
17) Some of the carbon dioxide exhaled with each breath is trapped behind the mask.
18) One study of health workers wearing masks showed that a third developed headaches requiring painkillers. Another study showed that 81% developed headaches – and their work was affected.
19) A mask can reduce blood oxygenation by up to 20% – leading to a possible loss of consciousness. At least one road crash has been blamed on a driver wearing a mask. Police reported that the driver of a single car crash in New Jersey is believed to have passed out behind the wheel after wearing a mask for too long.
20) Over a dozen studies failed to show that wearing a mask provides protection against infection.
21) Masks are being used as a conditioning tool to make us more compliant.
22) A study of 53 surgeons showed that there were statistically significant falls in blood oxygen levels after masks had been worn for a few hours. It is important to remember that surgeons who wear masks (and not all do) work while standing, rather than walking, and they work in a controlled, air conditioned environment. They do not touch their masks and they change them regularly.
23) The fact that the rules about mask wearing vary from place to place proves that there is no `science’ behind the advice to wear masks. So, for example, why should the coronavirus spread from person to person in a shop but not in an office?
24) There were no mask requirements in Sweden, and the mortality rate there remained below a bad flu season. The average age of Swedish citizens who died of covid-19 was well over 80 years.
25) A meta-analysis of controlled trials of face masks published in May 2020 by the Centers for Disease Control in the US, concluded that masks `did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory confirmed influenza, either when worn by infected persons or by persons in the general community to reduce their susceptibility’.
26) A meta- analysis published in May 2016 concluded that masks did not have any useful effect but that reuse of contaminated masks did transmit infection.
27) In 2019, a paper involving 2,862 volunteers and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association showed that both surgical masks and N95 respirators `resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory confirmed influenza’.
28) In 2011, a meta-analysis of 17 separate studies showed that none of the research showed masks to be useful in preventing influenza infection.
29) In 2009, a paper published in the Journal of Occupational Environmental Hygiene concluded that particles passed through masks and that expelled particles were deflected around the edges of masks.
30) Research published in 2005 concluded that there was more transmission of virus laden particles from masked individuals than from unmasked individuals because of `leakage’ jets of air. Backward unfiltered air flow was found to be stronger with mask wearers (suggesting that standing behind someone wearing a mask could be dangerous).
31) A study published in the BMJ in 2015 found that the penetration of cloth masks was almost 97%.
32) N95 masks are made with a 0.3 micron filter. The name comes from the fact that 95% of particles having a diameter of 0.3 microns are filtered by the mask. Unfortunately, coronaviruses are approximately 0.125 microns in diameter.
33) An article entitled `Is a mask necessary in the operating theatre?’, published in the Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons in 1981 found no difference in wound infection rates with or without surgical masks. A paper published in 1991 showed that the use of masks slightly increased the incidence of infection.
34) It was proved in 1920 that cloth masks do not stop flu transmission. It was concluded then that the number of layers of fabric required to prevent pathogen spread would be suffocating. It was also recognised that there was a problem with leakage around the edges of masks.
35) Mask wearers are encouraged to demonise non-mask wearers (even if they are disabled in some way). This is part of the psychological warfare battle being fought.
36) There have been suggestions from various authorities that mask wearing and social distancing will need to be permanent. It has also been suggested that masks should be worn in the home.
37) Masks collect fungi, bacteria and viruses and because of the moist air exhaled they are an excellent breeding ground.
38) `We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offer little, if any, protection from infection…In many cases the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.’ – New England Journal of Medicine, 2020
39) Research published in June 2020 suggested that the reduction in blood oxygen and the increase in carbon dioxide, resulting from mask wearing, might cause a strain on the heart and kidneys.
40) Mask wearers are more likely to develop infection than non-mask wearers. This may be due to the fact that masks reduce blood oxygen levels and adversely affect natural immunity. It is likely that anyone who wears a face mask for long periods will have a damaged immune system – and be more susceptible to infection. Studies have shown that hypoxia can inhibit immune cells used to fight viral infections. Wearing a mask may make the wearer more likely to develop an infection – and if an infection develops it is likely to be worse.
41) Masks can cause hypercapnia (increased carbon dioxide). Symptoms of hypercapnia include drowsiness, dizziness and fatigue.
42) A mask worn by a child in school was examined in a laboratory. Tests showed 82 bacterial colonies and 4 mould colonies growing on the mask.
43) In May 2020, Dr Fauci, the American covid-19 expert, concluded that masks are little more than symbolic – virtue signaling.
44) Although they have not been tested extensively, visors are probably just as useless as masks but they may be less dangerous to wearers.


Conclusion:
Having studied the evidence I believe that mask wearing is likely to do no good but a great deal of harm. The available evidence shows clearly that masks do not work but do have the potential to cause a variety of health problems. Any individual or organisation dismissing the information above as `fake news’ is requested to give their name and address. They will then receive a writ for libel. Please note that I am already in the process of planning two libel actions.
Dr. Vernon Coleman October 2020


If you would like something to show store managers, feel free to order one of these mask exemption cards, while supporting a freedom-loving, family-owned business at the same time!

Masks and Mask Wearing: 100 Facts You Must Know


1.  Surgeons have been using surgical masks since their introduction in 1897. It has for some years been customary for surgeons and nurses to wear surgical masks in the operating theatre and to change masks part of the way through any procedure lasting more than a few hours.  The dangers associated with mask wearing were assessed by five doctors and published in the journal Neurocirugia in 2008.

Although it is customary for operating theatres to be fitted with air conditioning systems, the writers of the article, entitled, Preliminary Report on Surgical Mask induced Deoxygenation During Major Surgery, pointed out that it is known that heat and moisture are trapped beneath surgical masks and concluded that ‘it seems reasonable that some of the exhaled carbon dioxide may also be trapped beneath them, inducing a decrease in blood oxygenation’.

A total of 53 surgeons, of both sexes, all employed at university hospitals and aged between 24 and 54 years of age were tested. All were non-smokers and none had any chronic lung disease. The test involved pulse oximetry before and after the course of an operation. The study showed that the longer a mask was worn the greater the fall in blood oxygen levels. This may lead to the individual passing out and it may also affect natural immunity – thereby increasing the risk of infection.  The masks used were disposable, sterile, one-way surgical paper masks. To eliminate the effect of dehydration over a several hour surgical operation, the surgeons were allowed after every hour to drink water through a straw.

The authors of the paper concluded that, ‘When the values for oxygen saturation of haemoglobin were compared, there were statistically significant differences only between preoperational and post operational values. As the duration of the operation increases, oxygen saturation of haemoglobin decreases significantly.’


2. This quote is taken from New England Journal of Medicine: ‘We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to covid-19 as face to face contact within six feet with a patient with symptomatic covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 20 minutes). The chance of catching covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.’ The reference is:  M.Klompas, C.Morris et al ‘Universal Masking in hospitals in the covid-19 era’ – New
England Journal of Medicine 2020


3. It is possible that wearing a mask for hours at a time could cause pulmonary fibrosis. In August 1988, the proceedings of the VIIth International Pneumoconioses Conference included details of three cases of pulmonary fibrosis, thought to be due to exposure to synthetic textile fibres. The first was a woman of 52 who had a dry cough with increasing  difficulty in breathing. Changes were visible on an X-ray. The woman had been working in a textile shop for 15 years where her job was measuring and cutting cloth – mainly synthetic materials. The second patient was a woman of 66 who also had difficulty in breathing. The lungs of this patient also showed X-ray changes. She was also involved in cutting and measuring synthetic fabrics. A third woman, aged 47, had bilateral pulmonary fibrosis. Studies have shown that loose fibres are seen on all types of masks and may be inhaled causing serious lung damage.

4.People who cough and sneeze into their mask increase the risk of a build-up of fungi and bacteria – which can lead to dangerous chest infections.

5. In 2015, the British Medical Journal published a paper entitled, A Cluster Randomized Trial of Cloth Masks Compared with Medical Masks in Healthcare Workers. The paper was written by nine authors from the University of New South Wales, the University of Sydney, the National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology in Vietnam and the Beijing Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in China. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of cloth masks to medical masks in hospital health care workers. The study, which was extensive, concluded that the results caution against the use of cloth masks.


‘This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety,’ concluded the authors. ‘Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.’  And the authors added: ‘…as a precautionary measure, cloth masks should not be recommended for health care workers, particularly in high risk situations, and guidelines need to be updated’.

For the remaining 95 facts, click here!
Source: Dr. Vernon Coleman

doctors explain why vaccines are [NOT] safe [NOR] effective

A bajillion links in 3, 2…

1. Dr. Nancy Banks – http://bit.ly/1Ip0aIm

2. Dr. Russell Blaylock – http://bit.ly/1BXxQZL

3. Dr. Shiv Chopra – http://bit.ly/1gdgh1s

4. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny – http://bit.ly/1MPVbjx

5. Dr. Suzanne Humphries – http://bit.ly/17sKDbf

6. Dr. Larry Palevsky – http://bit.ly/1LLEjf6

7. Dr. Toni Bark – http://bit.ly/1CYM9RB

8. Dr. Andrew Wakefield – http://bit.ly/1MuyNzo

9. Dr. Meryl Nass – http://bit.ly/1DGzJsc

10. Dr. Raymond Obomsawin – http://bit.ly/1G9ZXYl

11. Dr. Ghislaine Lanctot – http://bit.ly/1MrVeUL

12. Dr. Robert Rowen – http://bit.ly/1SIELeF

13. Dr. David Ayoub – http://bit.ly/1SIELve

14. Dr. Boyd Haley PhD – http://bit.ly/1KsdVby

15. Dr. Rashid Buttar – http://bit.ly/1gWOkL6

16. Dr. Roby Mitchell – http://bit.ly/1gdgEZU

17. Dr. Ken Stoller – http://bit.ly/1MPVqLI

18. Dr. Mayer Eisenstein – http://bit.ly/1LLEqHH

19. Dr. Frank Engley, PhD – http://bit.ly/1OHbLDI

20. Dr. David Davis – http://bit.ly/1gdgJwo

21. Dr Tetyana Obukhanych – http://bit.ly/16Z7k6J

22. Dr. Harold E Buttram – http://bit.ly/1Kru6Df

23. Dr. Kelly Brogan – http://bit.ly/1D31pfQ

24. Dr. RC Tent – http://bit.ly/1MPVwmu

25. Dr. Rebecca Carley – http://bit.ly/K49F4d

26. Dr. Andrew Moulden – http://bit.ly/1fwzKJu

27. Dr. Jack Wolfson – http://bit.ly/1wtPHRA

28. Dr. Michael Elice – http://bit.ly/1KsdpKA

29. Dr. Terry Wahls – http://bit.ly/1gWOBhd

30. Dr. Stephanie Seneff – http://bit.ly/1OtWxAY

31. Dr. Paul Thomas – http://bit.ly/1DpeXPf

32. Many doctors talking at once – http://bit.ly/1MPVHOv

33. Dr. Richard Moskowitz – censored

34. Dr. Jane Orient – http://bit.ly/1MXX7pb

35. Dr. Richard Deth – http://bit.ly/1GQDL10

36. Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic – http://bit.ly/1eqiPr5

37. Dr Chris Shaw – http://bit.ly/1IlGiBp

38. Dr. Susan McCreadie – http://bit.ly/1CqqN83

39. Dr. Mary Ann Block – http://bit.ly/1OHcyUX

40. Dr. David Brownstein – http://bit.ly/1EaHl9A

41. Dr. Jayne Donegan – http://bit.ly/1wOk4Zz

42. Dr. Troy Ross – censored

43. Dr. Philip Incao – http://bit.ly/1ghE7sS

44. Dr. Joseph Mercola – http://bit.ly/18dE38I

45. Dr. Jeff Bradstreet – http://bit.ly/1MaX0cC

46. Dr. Robert Mendelson – http://bit.ly/1JpAEQr

47. Dr Theresa Deisher https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=6Bc6WX33SuE

48. Dr. Sam Eggertsen-https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8LB-3xkeDAE

More doctors testifying that vaccines aren’t safe nor effective in documentaries:

1. Vaccination – The Silent Epidemic – http://bit.ly/1vvQJ2W

2. The Greater Good – http://bit.ly/1icxh8j

3. Shots In The Dark – http://bit.ly/1ObtC8h

4. Vaccination The Hidden Truth – http://bit.ly/KEYDUh

5. Vaccine Nation – http://bit.ly/1iKNvpU

6. Vaccination – The Truth About Vaccines – http://bit.ly/1vlpwvU

7. Lethal Injection – http://bit.ly/1URN7BJ

8. Bought – http://bit.ly/1M7YSlr

9. Deadly Immunity – http://bit.ly/1KUg64Z

10. Autism – Made in the USA – http://bit.ly/1J8WQN5

11. Beyond Treason – http://bit.ly/1B7kmvt

12. Trace Amounts – http://bit.ly/1vAH3Hv

13. Why We Don’t Vaccinate – http://bit.ly/1KbXhuf

9 hour court case



DOCUMENTARIES

1. Vaccination – The Silent Epidemic(2013): http://bit.ly/1vvQJ2W

2. The Greater Good – (2011)


3. Shots In The Dark -(2009): http://bit.ly/1ObtC8h

4. Vaccination The Hidden Truth -(1998): http://bit.ly/KEYDUh

5. Vaccine Nation – (2008)


6. Vaccination – The Truth About Vaccines: http://bit.ly/1vlpwvU

7. Lethal Injection – http://bit.ly/1URN7BJ

8. Bought – (2015)


9. Deadly Immunity – (2005): http://bit.ly/1KUg64Z

10. Autism – Made in the USA(2009): http://bit.ly/1J8WQN5

11. Beyond Treason – (2005): http://bit.ly/1B7kmvt

12. Trace Amounts – (2014): http://bit.ly/1vAH3Hv

13. Why We Don’t Vaccinate –

14. Autism Yesterday – (2010): http://bit.ly/1URU2A7

Let’s see how long these links last before they’re censored. Sigh…

{con}spiracy theories

Conspiracy theories will not be tolerated, you say??

But what qualifies as… or WHO (no pun intended, but it works) gets to quantify a “conspiracy theory”?? With so many of mine coming to light in 2020, I’m wondering if ANY “conspiracies” exist. 

Organizations or individuals who traffic in conspiracy theories, propaganda and lies to spread disinformation will not be tolerated, and we’ll work with the WHCA to decide how to handle those instances moving forward.” -Biden

They seek to drown out every voice but theirs. Do we really believe that the WHO listed “vax hesitancy” as a global health threat by coincidence?

https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019

THAT would be a conspiracy theory, right?! 

https://reclaimthenet.org/white-house-press-pass-criteria-conspiracy-theories-disinformation/

Just like Bill Gates spraying us… but if you’ve been here for a minute, you’ve seen me talk about him.  Those lines in the sky are certainly NOT love letters to us.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/arielcohen/2021/01/11/bill-gates-backed-climate-solution-gains-traction-but-concerns-linger/?fbclid=IwAR1LfoOXQrmDnHZvG_-EXDg0UrTgzFh7wi_OGUIyKS_F1HCP8KHwH4PqNSg

And the health risks: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29732947/

Who coined the term “conspiracy theory” again? 

It was the See-I-A that likely played the greatest role in effectively “weaponizing” the term. (research why –> had a little something to do with President JFK’s assassination) Since the 1960s, the label has become a disciplinary device that has been effective in defining targeted events off limits to inquiry or debate. 

http://assassinationofjfk.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/CIA-Memo-Warren-Commission.pdf

Someone will always try to interpret this world for us. As followers of Christ, it’s our responsibility to filter everything through God, using wise discernment.

If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, which giveth to all men liberally, and reproacheth no man, and it shall be given him. -James 1:5

We certainly cannot trust in the government to fix the government… the only plan I’m trusting is God’s.

 

favorite things {NOT} amazon

A life without Amazon. What does that look like??

(click here and here to read just a couple reasons to breakup with amazon)

As many of us are seeking to break away from big box stores, here are a few alternatives to consider. I will be adding to this list, as I come across other proven alternatives. Let me know, if you have any valued businesses.


BOOKS

Thrift Books

For littles:
The Tuttle Twins

 

 

Pet Supplies:

Azure Standard (search animal)

Chewy

 


This and That
: houseware items, supplements, gifts, etc.

Azure Standard

Ebay

Life Extensions

Nature’s Warehouse

Overstock

Swanson Vitamins

VITACOST

Tips:
Of course, shopping local is great! Some have suggested looking up items in Amazon to read reviews… then order directly from the manufacturer.

 

*disclaimer: I have not researched every aspect of each of these companies (where they make donations, etc). This is simply to encourage a much-needed breakup from Amazon.

i know {who} holds tomorrow

I love this community! But I realized I had to set boundaries for myself [by turning off Instagram replies in stories] when my inbox became FLOODED with fear. From Christians.

I get it. These headlines are not easy to navigate. But, as Christ-followers, our response should look different —> Even if we have to shake ourselves as the psalmist did when he told. his. soul. to hope in God. (Psalm 43:5)

We have a HOPE that’s bigger than… (insert any headline here — today, it’s drama on our nation’s capitol). No matter the circumstance, the message remains the same.

Salvation is found in Christ.
Stay away from vacksheens.
Stop listening to the lies of the enemy.

Satan’s days are numbered. And he ain’t happy about it.
But we can certainly rejoice! The joy of the Lord is our strength. Amen!

“To reveal the kingdom coming
And to reconcile the lost
To redeem the whole creation
You did not despise the cross

For even in Your suffering
You saw to the other side
Knowing this was our salvation
Jesus for our sake You died

And the morning that You rose
All of heaven held its breath
Till that stone was moved for good
For the Lamb had conquered death

And the dead rose from their tombs
And the angels stood in awe
For the souls of all who’d come
To the Father are restored

And the Church of Christ was born
Then the Spirit lit the flame
Now this gospel truth of old
Shall not kneel shall not faint

By His blood and in His Name
In His freedom I am free
For the love of Jesus Christ
Who has resurrected me”

p.s. I’m not a huge fan of the author of the song, but that doesn’t change the truth in the message. Also… You CAN still message me! 😉

Research, Don’t Regret

Read the research. It’s all we ask.

Tone and intent certainly don’t come across in text, but if you talk to me, you understand I share this sort of information out of love, attempting to save anyone heartache of injury. Not rare, just rarely reported (drs are not taught how to report them and parents of injured children are often gaslighted). Now that injuries are making headlines (ex. Bell’s Palsy), they are attempting to normalize them. Not cool.

We vaccinate and we’re fine.”

Read 13.1 on every vax insert and also ask where the sudden rise in autoimmune issues, etc. could possibly stem from… especially after the act of 1986, relieving pharma from liability and the subsequent rise in vaxs??

If nothing else, take the time to read ingredients and ask if it would be okay to ingest —> much less inject <— this toxic brew, bypassing our God-given immune systems?

Ingredients include: aborted fetal cells (yes, an entire genome has been found), E. Coli, polysorbate 80 & 20, monkey kidney cells, Formaldehyde, insect cells, aluminum, barium, latex rubber, dog kidney, Calf serum, neomycin, egg components, peanut and soy bean oil, etc, etc…

But at least we don’t have Polio!

Read Dissolving Illusions with Dr. Suzanne Humphries for a better perspective of vax history. Polio has simply been reclassified —> transverse myelitis, AFM, Guillain-Barré syndrome. “But we don’t have iron lungs anymore.” -> Ventilators.

But Dr. Humphries is an anti-vax quack.

Yeah… Google is not our friend.  😉  That’s what they want us to think. She changed her perspective on vaccines after listening to her patients, seeing the damage first-hand. THEN she researched the information they DON’T teach in med school. There is nothing in it for drs who speak out. If anything, their careers are on the line. Those are the voices we should be listening to…

But we should trust the scientists.”

Have you ever heard of whistleblower Dr. William Thompson? Rep. Bill Posey has tried, but Congress still refuses to subpoena Thompson. The Vaxxed documentaries give a quick little history on his eyewitness account of the CDC destroying data (which showed black boys getting autism at extremely high rates). Scientists destroyed data that could save MANY people from injury!

How I wish I were wrong about all of this… Research, don’t regret. I have plenty on my “resources” page to get you started! Blessings!


Blind trust is dangerous science…

Text exchange via: @beilersinlove

don’t be {selfish}

Have you ever had a negative reaction to a medication?

What did you do? You stopped taking it, and your doctor noted it in your file. You were likely told not to ever take that medication again.

If you have a negative reaction to a vaccine, your doctor MAY say, “You shouldn’t take this again, and you probably shouldn’t take any medications LIKE this again.” It may or may not be noted in your file.

Your doctor may also say, “That’s impossible. That doesn’t happen. It’s coincidence.”

There are often differences in how doctors handle reactions, depending on whether it’s an oral medication or a vaccine. Part of this difference may be due to the fact that insurance reimbursement and yearly bonuses are tied to the percentage of vaccine uptake in the practice.

There’s another major difference here.
You can stop taking an oral medication.
You can never un-vaccinate.

Let that sink in.

With the brand new Covid vaccine, using brand new technology, if something happens to you, you cannot sue the manufacturer. You can’t sue the doctor. You can’t sue the nurse who stuck it in your arm.

You’re on your own.

Here is what I would suggest:

If you choose to get the shot, please talk to your friends and family members first. Let them know your plans for long-term care, and how you will pay for it. Ask them if they will be willing to care for you for the rest of your life, if something happens. Ask if they will be willing to give up their career and be with you 24/7 should you require it.

This decision doesn’t just affect you.

Please. Don’t be selfish.

— Marcella Piper-Terry

speaking of {infection} numbers…

We just looked at the CDC’s total list of deaths per year  (I’m not splitting hair over the 2020 numbers — I simply don’t trust any of the rona cases, nor tests) — let’s look at the rate of possibility to “infect” someone with a virus.

An analysis of risk by Bob Moran…

“First of all, given that you have no symptoms, what are the chances that you are infected with SARS-CoV-2? The UK Office of National Statistics estimates this to be 1 in 115, or 0.87%.  https://www.ons.gov.uk/…/coronaviruscovid19infec…/latest

Now, imagining you are infected, but you don’t have any symptoms, what is the probability that you will infect somebody else with SARS-CoV-2?  Recent studies show this is around 0.7%.  https://jamanetwork.com/…/jamanetwo…/fullarticle/2774102

If we multiply the probability of these two events, we can calculate the likelihood of you a) being infected &
b) passing that infection on without symptoms. This gives a figure of 0.006%.  To put that figure in context, it’s roughly the same as your chance of dying in a car crash over the course of any given year.  http://www.bandolier.org.uk/booth/Risk/trasnsportpop.htmlBut if you infect someone, this doesn’t mean that they are going to end up dying of Covid pneumonia. Far from it, in fact. There is a lot of debate regarding the IFR of SARS-CoV-2, but the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine puts it at roughly 0.5%. (99.5% of infected people survive, even higher if you’re younger)  https://www.cebm.net/…/estimating-the-infection…/

Now, if we multiply the chance of infecting another person (without symptoms) by the fatality rate, we can estimate that the risk of “killing” one of your relatives is roughly 0.00003%, or 1 in 3 million.

Obviously there are a lot of caveats. If one of your relatives is very old and very ill, then the IFR is going to be higher. If they are relatively healthy, it’s going to be lower.

But there’s another caveat. PCR tests. The first number we used (the number of infected individuals in the UK) is based on positive PCR results. It is possible that only 3% of these positive results are accurate. https://academic.oup.com/…/10.1093/cid/ciaa1491/5912603

Which means that the risk of a person “killing” a relative without any discernible coronavirus symptoms may well be as low as 1 in 30 million – the same sort of likelihood of you winning the National Lottery.

Clearly, it is for individuals to assess risks for themselves and make decisions accordingly. But they should do so in the knowledge of how big those risks actually are. And nobody should be calling others “irresponsible” for taking a risk this minuscule.

Finally, this risk isn’t just the justification for ‘cancelling Christmas’, it’s the justification for all of it. Lockdowns, masks, school closures, undiagnosed cancers, suicides, stillbirths, unemployment. All done because we were told this specific risk was just too high.”

– Bob Moran of Bob’s Cartoons

But… “Bob Moran is not a doctor or scientist.”

Nope. But, HERE’S ONE!  Sucharit Bhakdi is a Thai-German specialist in microbiology, having studied at the universities of Bonn, Giesen, Mainz, and Copenhagen.  He also studied at the Max Planck Institute Of Immunobiology And Epigenetics in Freiburg, and is a professor emeritus of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, and from 1991 to 2012 was head of the Institute Of Medical Microbiology & Hygiene.

Here’s the takeaway:

  • don’t blindly trust the media

  • masks and social distancing are pointless

  • COVID-19 is about as serious as influenza (which isn’t very serious)

  • a COVID-19 vaccine isn’t necessary

  • go back to living a normal life.

**disclaimer: ANY numbers reflecting infection/contagion via a virus makes the high assumption that viruses work the way we are being told. In the words of Dr. Mikovits, “dig deeper.”

p.s.  Asymptomatic = presenting no symptoms or evidence of illness or abnormality = HEALTHY!

 

in a {REAL} pandemic…

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020 (as of Nov)

Even with Jan & December of 2020 added, the numbers do NOT justify a worldwide mandatory lockdown, mask, nor vaccine.

Additionally, these numbers do not tell the whole story… Will history books include the death count to reflect those who died from suicide? loneliness? abuse?  flawed medical treatment? Will the truth be told about false positive tests? (coca-cola tested positive, for goodness sake) Or the fact that this virus has never been isolated?? (hint: you will not find the truth on the first page of google – dig deeper) Will history mention families angered by a doctored COD on death certificates? What about bribes for loved ones if they claim COD as “covid”??

I will never {EVER} trust a government which systematically poisons our air, food, and water.


“If it was truly a pandemic, no one would be talking about stats like this, trying to prove it was a pandemic. And you wouldn’t have to be tested to know you have it…”

“In a real pandemic, medical professionals wouldn’t have time for TikToks.”

“How will we know if the vaccine is working? Will the survival rate go from 99.7% to 99.8%?”

“Give an inch and they take… everything!”

“FEAR IS THE REAL VIRUS!”

“For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind.”
2 Tim. 1:7

lying about numbers

+++disclaimer: I am not denying that people have been sick with a virus. This is simply a gentle reminder that viruses mutate. It’s what they do.

Make common sense common again!